@hangc10 I did say there was some 'luck' factor in it, but 'skill' factor Im talking about can topple to stastical % ratio, you were saying this game requires no skill because it was all about luck, and I gave the reason why its not what you said it was, but rather player's skill is what determines the outcome of this game
@gkdlswm5 your ways of saying skills factor is right, but same thing as confident. Both of them doesn't make you see your opponent cards. It's still by luck if you win or lose.
when I said there is a skill factor that could tip the odds, despite what the statics may say - and just because you have confidence doesn't mean you can do well in the game, why? because how do you read your opponents, guessing their cards, making the right decision - and fyi confidence is part of the skills to play this game
@gkdlswm5 thats not my problem moron... I don't even know where you came from talking about his story or book. The title of what I argue was about skills vs luck. It doesn't require skills is all I can say. All it require is fate and confident enough to go with what you have... Read before you open your mouth towards my arguement.
@hangc10 because you can minimize/maximize the win/loss by folding, calling, or being counteragressive -- and lets see if you can do math, the chance of Yang winning was 1/10, considering there was 9 people he was least likely to win, and 1 seed had over 33.333 chance to win with 54 million in comparison to 24mil of yang
at the end Yang took out like 3 people (read his book dipshit) and had 100 mil in chips? some incredible luck right there, if you don't know shit stfu
@gkdlswm5 ok, tell me this... if you have double AA, what makes you think you're the winner with this hand? Tell me if this hand need skills? All you really need is luck and know the rules. I wonder who's the dumb@ss.
@hangc10 lol ok, why not bring your 20mil and on each bet you put up more than you can earn in your life, and knowing there are certain % chance that your opponent will have higher cards than you, try to throw off your opponent
when win/loss isn't 100% dictated by pure luck, some other factor needs to come into play and if that other facctor isn't your skill to play the game idk what is, with that in regard, you sir is a fucking dumbass
poker doesn't need skills to be a winner. If you think it take skills to beat someone; you're not just an idiot, but a SUPER DUMB person to say such a thing like that. Gamble = luck. When you mention skills; i'm assuming you mean bluffing to scare off your opponents. You won't get the cards you wanted unless you cheated.
Unless he stole ur girlfriend or do u dirty personalty LOL.....u should not hate on him.....b happy for him...cause he one of ur fellow Hmong if u r Hmong...
@hangc10 I did say there was some 'luck' factor in it, but 'skill' factor Im talking about can topple to stastical % ratio, you were saying this game requires no skill because it was all about luck, and I gave the reason why its not what you said it was, but rather player's skill is what determines the outcome of this game
gkdlswm5 2 months ago
@gkdlswm5 your ways of saying skills factor is right, but same thing as confident. Both of them doesn't make you see your opponent cards. It's still by luck if you win or lose.
hangc10 3 months ago
@hangc10 book's title was : All-in, ofc by JY
when I said there is a skill factor that could tip the odds, despite what the statics may say - and just because you have confidence doesn't mean you can do well in the game, why? because how do you read your opponents, guessing their cards, making the right decision - and fyi confidence is part of the skills to play this game
gkdlswm5 3 months ago
@gkdlswm5 thats not my problem moron... I don't even know where you came from talking about his story or book. The title of what I argue was about skills vs luck. It doesn't require skills is all I can say. All it require is fate and confident enough to go with what you have... Read before you open your mouth towards my arguement.
hangc10 3 months ago
@hangc10 because you can minimize/maximize the win/loss by folding, calling, or being counteragressive -- and lets see if you can do math, the chance of Yang winning was 1/10, considering there was 9 people he was least likely to win, and 1 seed had over 33.333 chance to win with 54 million in comparison to 24mil of yang
at the end Yang took out like 3 people (read his book dipshit) and had 100 mil in chips? some incredible luck right there, if you don't know shit stfu
gkdlswm5 3 months ago
@gkdlswm5 ok, tell me this... if you have double AA, what makes you think you're the winner with this hand? Tell me if this hand need skills? All you really need is luck and know the rules. I wonder who's the dumb@ss.
hangc10 3 months ago
@hangc10 lol ok, why not bring your 20mil and on each bet you put up more than you can earn in your life, and knowing there are certain % chance that your opponent will have higher cards than you, try to throw off your opponent
when win/loss isn't 100% dictated by pure luck, some other factor needs to come into play and if that other facctor isn't your skill to play the game idk what is, with that in regard, you sir is a fucking dumbass
gkdlswm5 3 months ago
overview of all major hands/ eliminations /watch?v=FEaZRTBBePc&NR=1
TheBishop12 5 months ago
poker doesn't need skills to be a winner. If you think it take skills to beat someone; you're not just an idiot, but a SUPER DUMB person to say such a thing like that. Gamble = luck. When you mention skills; i'm assuming you mean bluffing to scare off your opponents. You won't get the cards you wanted unless you cheated.
hangc10 5 months ago
Unless he stole ur girlfriend or do u dirty personalty LOL.....u should not hate on him.....b happy for him...cause he one of ur fellow Hmong if u r Hmong...
ShuTheFuckup916 6 months ago