God's 3-D photograph and X-ray of the Resurrection

The Hungary Prayer Manuscript of 1192 illustrates what can only be the Shroud of Turin, predating the earliest possible date of manufacture calculated by the AMS Carbon 14 testing.




All of what I have explained above can be found in the voluminous scientific and popular literature on the shroud of Turin. At this point, I would like to offer a different paradigm for assessing the accuracy of the 14th century date and the resulting claim that the shroud is the work of a 14th century forger. Again, this article is not addressing the issue of whether or not the Shroud of Turin was the burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth and its value as a "relic" of Christianity. It addresses only whether the shroud is a genuine archaeological artifact of a 1st century crucifixion. This paradigm assumes that the radiocarbonists' claim that the Shroud of Turin is a 14th century forgery is correct. It is based on what that conclusion tells us about the forger. It tells us that:

1. The forger first painted the bloodstains before he painted the image.

2. The forger integrated forensic qualities to his image that would only be known 20th century science.

3. The forger duplicated blood flow patterns in perfect forensic agreement to blood flow from the wrists at 65° from vertical to suggest the exact crucifixion position of the arms.

4. The forger "painted" the blood flows with genuine group AB blood that he had "spiked" with excessive amounts of bilirubin since the forger knew that severe concussive scourging with a Roman flagrum would cause erythrocyte hemolysis and jaundice.

5. The forger "plotted" the scourge marks on the body of the "man in the shroud" to be consistent under forensic examination with two scourgers of varying height.

6. The forger also duplicated abrasion and compression marks on the scourge wounds of the shoulders to suggest to 20th century forensic examiners that the "man in the shroud" had carried a heavy weight following the scourging.

7. The forger, against all convention of medieval artistry, painted the body he was "hoaxing" as Jesus of Nazareth, nude to conform to genuine Roman crucifixions.

8. The forger, as the forensic genius he was, illustrated the nails of crucifixion accurately through the wrists rather than the hands as in all other conventional medieval representations. He also took into account that the thumbs of a crucified victim would rotate inward as a result of median nerve damage as the nails passed through the spaces of Destot.

9. The forger was clever enough to "salt" the linen with the pollens of plants indigenous only to the environs of Jerusalem in anticipation of 20th century palynological analysis.

10. The forger was an artist who surpassed the talents of all known artists to the present day, being able to "paint" an anatomically and photographically perfect human image in a photographic negative manner, centuries before photography, and be able to do so without being able to check his work, close up, as he progressed.

11. The forger was able to paint this image with some unknown medium using an unknown technique, 30-40 feet away in order to discern the shadowy image as he continued.

12. The forger was clever enough to depict an adult with an unplaited pony-tail, sidelocks and a beard style consistent with a Jewish male of the 1st century.

13. The forger thought of such minute details as incorporating dirt from the bare feet of the "man in the shroud" consistent with the calcium carbonate soil of the environs of Jerusalem.

14. This forger was such an expert in 20th century biochemistry, medicine, forensic pathology and anatomy, botany, photography and 3-D computer analysis that he has foiled all the efforts of modern science. His unknown and historically unduplicated artistic technique surpasses all great historical artists, making the pale efforts of DaVinci, Michaelangelo, Raphael and Botticelli appear as infantile scribblings.

If the Shroud of Turin is a forgery of the 14th century, as the radiocarbonists claim, and not a genuine artifact of the 1st century, all of these qualities of the purported medieval "forger" must be accepted. If the Shroud was "forged" it would have to have been painted.

It is an irrefutable fact that there is NO paint or pigment on the Shroud of Turin leaving the only explanation of the technique of the forger to have used "photography" to manufacture the relic in the THIRTEENTH CENTURY!! Some authors have gone so far as to suggest exactly that. This is patently absurd!

CONCLUSION

The Shroud of Turin is a genuine artifact of a first century Roman crucifixion of an adult Jewish male. The radiocarbon dating placing the manufacture of the linen in the 14th century was flawed by extrinsic C14 accumulated over centuries of fungal growth, candle smoke and the intense heat of the fire of 1532. There is NO paint on the linen of the shroud and is not the artifice of a forger.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• shroud
• Jesus
• God
• Photograph
• Palin
• Damon
• Fey
• Resurrection
• Turin
• Ian
• Wilson
• Barry
• Schwortz
• McCain
• Obama
• The
• Hills
• Terminator
• Bale
• Broncos
• Will
• Smith
• Cyrus

[glad2meetu236]

who ever posts negative comments, wouldnt believe in JESUS if HE knocked in their door. Havent you been watching the video? What more proof do you want, the 2nd Coming? Helloooooooooooooooooooooooooo

[dingorex]

They haven't thought through the gravity of the Resurrection of Christ or the mysteriousness of the shroud, else they would not be spouting the non-arguments. They haven't experienced God's love in a personal way through the power of the Holy Spirit. People are wilfully ignorant sadly.

[hb9791]

febriand0 Jesus is God and he could of helped himself but if he wasnt bruitially murdered and killed we wouldn't have a Chance to go to heaven or hell so if i were you id change your life and mohammed isn't the real God wat he do for you mikecampochiaro? did he change your life? i use to be a punk, drug addict. i had several citations and a felony. Nothing on this earth could of saved me from the rode i was headed on. Only Jesus Christ could. He saved my life and he can save yours!

[dingorex]

What book does this occur in, what you just described? I'm curious.

[febriand0]

what a pity jesus to be called GOD. he can't even help himself neither his father in the heaven or the holy ghost. this is the body to one of his betrayed friend. for jesus himself had raised bodily and soul to heaven by GOD almighty until the day he will return to save the world when one eyed Dajjal terrorize the world and prophet jesus will defeat him; by then the world will last for another 100 years before the actual end-of-the-world takes place.

[cat22203]

One of the Virgins in the after life stole it...

[cat22203]

I guess you mean Leonardo Di Caprio....

[paxcoder]

Hehe "Leonardo". Good one, bro. XD

[dingorex]

I agree. The shroud has been saved from fire able to melt the silver case it was stored in. This, plus the dowsing with water, the reweaving at that corner sample, which is obviously discolored from other possible sample sites would throw off any C 14 test, imo.

[onelazysurfah]

The age-dating process failed to recognize one of the first rules of analytical chemistry that any sample taken for characterization of an area or population must necessarily be representative of the whole. The part must be representative of the whole. Our analyses of the three thread samples taken from the Raes and C-14 sampling corner showed that this was not the case.