Richard Dawkins' Ignorance of the Oscillating Universe
Uploader Comments (drcraigvideos)
Top Comments
-
Richard Dawkin's is a Biologist. He's not a physicist nor a cosmologist. If you want sound smart, have a decent physics debate with Steven Weinberg or Leonard Susskind.
All Comments (59)
-
@Spaceman2451 If he doesn't study a particular subject, then he needs to shut his arrogant face about it.
-
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
-
@Boreas171270 You are absolutely right. Looking at the methods of Mr. Craig, one can clearly see what is his goal: preach the mos convincingly as possible to people tha may be in doubt, to sound "scientific" (wich he is not) and sell his beliefs. He doesn't care about the opponents questions, he just throw his stuff as absolute truth. Also, he knows that he will not convince people with some scientific training.
-
Richard Dawkins is evolutionary biologist. Not a cosmologist, he doesn't study the singularity or the big bang. If you want info on the universe go ask Dr. Kaku or Dr Tyson.
-
Shamwow!!!!!!!!!
-
@Boreas171270 @Boreas171270 Now now - you're being disingenuous! It would behoove Dawkins - or any serious atheist, for that matter, to familiarize himself with the most cogent arguments against atheism. At present, most physicists seem to agree that, perhaps, the most profound challenge to the atheist, does come from the field of cosmology. Dawkins' ignorance is quite telling - good evolutionary biologist though he is!
-
I can also perfectly understand that Dawkins does not want to debate every loud mouthed Christian apologist whose sole goal is to blast him away with rhetorical debating trickery without adressing the important issues. That is precisely Dr. Craig's method and apart from the abstract Kalam Cosmology based arguments (that are easily refuted) this guy has not mutch to say. I think that that does not qualify him to demand debating time with Dawkins. If otherwise, who is next, Ray Comfort, Kent Hovi
Furthermore, Dawkins has no strong opinions on cosmological matters since he humbly knows that is not his field. He only mentions some contemporary theories with reference to acclaimed scientists. Read the book and see for yourself. Dr. Craig however, who is not a scientist at all, thinks he can juggle around with abstract physical theories he does not understand. Now who is the charlatan here?
Boreas171270 7 months ago
@Boreas171270 Actually, if YOU read the book, Dawkins does deal with the cosmological matter in depth! Are you crazy? Furthermore, Craig is a philosopher of science. I'm willing to bet he knows more about science than Dawkins.
drcraigvideos 7 months ago
Oh dear. The lengths people are willing to go to avoid God.
TheSeanWilson 1 year ago
@TheSeanWilson It's so typical of Dawkins. He'll believe LITERALLY ANYTHING so long as it offers a refutation of God.
drcraigvideos 1 year ago 2