Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Why I am not a Roman Catholic #1 Transubstantiation

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
12,636
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 4, 2006

csunite.com.com
Transubstantiation = Transformation of Substance

Transformation= A material of a particular kind or constitution.

Substance = a qualitative change

If I said I changed the apple to a banana, and it still looked like an apple and tasted like an apple, then I could conclude it never changed.

If Roman Catholic priests claim, transubstantiation when they speak of the bread and the wine. IF the transformation of the subsance does not occur on a regular basis, they are false.

In 1551 the Council of Trent officially defined that "by the consecration of the bread and wine there takes place a change of the whole substance of the bread into the substance of the body of Christ our Lord and of the whole substance of the wine into the substance of his blood. This change the holy Catholic Church has fittingly and properly called transubstantiation" (Session XIII, chapter IV; cf. canon II).

  • likes, 133 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (christianstudents)

  • Hola,

    en lugar de pensar y ver en que puedo uno atacar a otro, deberiamos de unirnos, ya que todos (católicos, protestantes) somos cristianos, porque creemos en Cristo. A Dios le ha de dar mucha pena ver este tipo de separaciones entre sus hijos."El que dice amo a Dios, y no ama a su hermano, es un mentiroso". Debemos aprender a respetar, ya que ofendemos al mismisimo Jesucristo. el fundó su iglesia en Pedro, y muchos años despues el hombre separo la religion (lean la biblia). Gracias.

  • @aleisnice estaria de acuerdo si creeria que los Catolicos tubieran el evangelio, pero tristesamente, todavia no encuentro un catolico que cree en el evangelio. Mas de nada niegan la hobra de Dios, quando creen en purgatorio.

  • Matt 26:26 Take eat, this IS my Body. Take drink this IS my blood. He did not say this "represents" my body, or this is "figuratively" my body. < The keyword being "IS"

    So then, either Jesus Christ is lying (and it's not possible for GOD to lie by the way) "or" you and the other protestant liars are lying. Personally I believe Jesus Christ's words in Matt 26:26 you and others should have learned that lesson from EVE (when she believed the serpents words over GODS word)

  • @jofo817 I believe in God's word, Its just you interpret the text different than I do. I am challenging how roman catholics view Transubstantiation. When Jesus did miracles, they really happen. when he raised the dead, it really happens. I don't pretend it happens. Can show me a priest that can tun the wafer into flesh on a weekly basis? not figuratevly but literaly ?

see all

All Comments (2,006)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Catholics have the sacrifice at the mass because we are asked to do this in rememberance of him.

  • This video on transubstantiation has no basis at all. He compares a banana and an apple; yet forgets that one of them either the apple or banana needs to be God.

    Lutherisms are just as heretical as all other churches under the protestant umbrella.

    Christ is still on the cross in Catholic Churches, because if he did not die on the cross; then we'll all have hell to literally pay.

    Repentance is only shown by penance. No man is sorry until he actually sheds a tear. Actions speak louder than words.

  • excuse me, how do i know that ur interpretations are true and correct? Oh i dont and cant...Sorry Ill put my faith in the Church Jesus Christ started, the Catholic Church. What authority by God do you have? That suddenly you are all knowing and know the right way to interpret scripture? I hope you trust yourself to never make a mistake with scripture..cuz if you do, you'll be ignorant of things that God wanted to tell you. Look this up, miracle at lanciano.

  • @gtepp031387 the Catholic Church murdered over 50 million Christians... where is the confusion

  • 1 Cor. 11:30 - this verse alludes to the consequences of receiving the Eucharist unworthily. Receiving the actual body and blood of Jesus in mortal sin results in actual physical consequences to our bodies. Can symbolic things actually bring physical consequences to our bodies?

  • Cor. 11:27-29 - in these verses, Paul says that eating or drinking in an unworthy manner is the equivalent of profaning (literally, murdering) the body and blood of the Lord. If this is just a symbol, we cannot be guilty of actually profaning (murdering) it. We cannot murder a symbol. Either Paul, the divinely inspired apostle of God, is imposing an unjust penalty, or the Eucharist is the actual body and blood of Christ.

  • Matt. 26:26; Mark. 14:22; Luke 22:19 - to deny the 2,000 year-old Catholic understanding of the Eucharist, Protestants must argue that Jesus was really saying "this represents (not is) my body and blood." However, Aramaic, the language that Jesus spoke, had over 30 words for "represent," but Jesus did not use any of them. He used the Aramaic word for "estin" which means "is."

  • Matt. 26:26; Mark. 14:22; Luke 22:19-20 - the Greek phrase is "Touto estin to soma mou." This phraseology means "this is actually" or "this is really" my body and blood.

    1 Cor. 11:24 - the same translation is used by Paul - "touto mou estin to soma." The statement is "this is really" my body and blood. Nowhere in Scripture does God ever declare something without making it so.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more