Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Texel - Lunar Lander Challenge at the X-Prize Cup

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
34,294
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 6, 2007

Flight at Oklahoma spaceport

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Sirius35BZH)

  • Unidentified flying object = UFO

    this is a IFO identified flying object

  • better way is to say trust... and not to transform it

    This is an Texel Module from Armadillo Aerospace

  • there are systems with gyros ;)

Top Comments

  • Eh, how does it and why would dropping it from 50,000 feet in our atmosphere give you a better appreciation of it?

  • Well since this is a launch vehicle being designed for orbital space launches. I don't see the relevance of comparing it to a commercial jet. Plus I believe there engine system runs off LOX and methanol. I wouldn't call that a fake engine either mate... I don't know which engine is being used in this video but there 8" LOX/meth. engine is expected to produce up 20,000 lbs of thrust. Much more then a planes engine of similar size!

see all

All Comments (39)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @sodia1 yes planes do have their efficiency but not in the vacuum of outer space and that's what this thing's designed for!

  • @hamzooKLR How can it be 'unidentified' when we know what it is?

  • sooo f-ing sweet....

  • That looks awfully dangerous.

  • Impressive.

    It is like balancing a rocket on top of a parabola. The rocket orientation must be kept upright within a certain tolerance.

    What solutions will be implimented too correct the rocket when it exceeds 30% from straight up?

  • simply use retractable landing pods...

  • Don't forget, this is working in 1 G Earth-gravity at sea-level. It only has to work 1/6th G in the Lunar vicinity.

  • Impressive! :)

  • This is cool its the first new technology lander to even come close to the 1960`s LLV test vehicle for the original Apollo lunar module problems are to much thrust rake under vehicle too much noise not enough control looks like it could be lost pretty quick needs much better landing soft and much much more docile control in flight it doesnt look very controllable or safe for human passengers etc.

  • Needs shock absorber landing struts

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more