Richard's Thetford Forest timelapse
Top Comments
All Comments (35)
-
What a boring waste of time.
-
Visit Mexico please.........
-
kill his camera??? I don't see why this could possibly happen. My point is that the video seems as if they didn't take enough frames and so they make each frame time on screen last an age before changing.
For an effective timelapse it would be far better to take a frame every 2 - 5 seconds. And then for saving the film, the frames should be saved at a rate of around 15 - 25 Frames Per Second. As such a far greater effect would be created.
-
@bartonboy37 hey. it was from about 6pm till 10:45pm. there was a couple of other bands that i think were sponsoring keane to get more famous at the beginning. :)
-
@GLove39 Rich probably doesn't want to kill his camera. Smart man.
-
@bob1304567 hi how long was the gig did anyone else play?
-
Music Fail
-
Sweet vid and even better music ;)
@GLove39 doing timelapses pictures aren't good for your camera. cameras only have a certain amount of life and the shutter going off every 2 seconds for 3- 4 hours is a lot of fucking pictures!
lbomb8 1 year ago 4
in terms of timelapse, surely the fps rate should be a lot faster?
GLove39 1 year ago 3