The Fraud of Turin

This video is about how the story of Christianity negates the possibility of the Shroud of Turin being genuine.

If Jesus was only dead for THREE DAYS and then arose from the dead, then obviously THREE DAYS isn't sufficient time to make the imprint of Jesus' face in the Shroud. If he were buried in the Shroud for 2,000 years THEN maybe his image could be transposed. But the story of Christianity negates this possibility by claiming that he was only dead for THREE DAYS.

This Shroud of Turin is like everything else in Christianity, as see through as a window. It is just more of the mindless mysticism that is passed off as religious 'miracles', like the Jesus face on the tortilla chip nonsense. Please take your brains back and try to use it for something other than to stop the echo in your skulls! The Shroud of Turin is a FRAUD!!!

Category:

Education

Tags:

• shroud
• of
• turin
• fraud
• jesus
• christ
• bible
• days
• christianity
• see
• through

[Dectheboner]

And here we have a man that knows the truth. WOW!

[Thug4zim]

omg u have this all wrong mate. usually I agree with u. The point is that like the way you make a picture on a film. You need to have the correct combination of light an material. I dont need 2000 years to make a picture now do I? It is ppossible that with divine intervention or dare I say "superior technology" its is plausible that the shroud is real. The sons of Levi in the third book of moses (Leviticus) were given knowledge by god to build the arch of the covenant.

YOUR REASONING IS SILLY!!

[Johnnys627]

we could just agree to lack the understanding on how something like this could of happened, because even now people arent very sure on how it could be madesure icould thinkof somechemical reactions but i think yourhating on yourself that you cant understandingor accept the possibility of something that extents outside of your own understanding... sounds a bit like a god complex. but then againim not yet a psychologiststillyour lack offaithhumilitydoesnt prove muchsave ignorances in some respects

[Melissa19950227]

excuse me Mr ChucksterOLove i have no problem with you ranting about stuff you belive or dont as long as you dont insult my religion i am a catholic and proud of it but i wont insult other faiths nor try to shove my belifes down their throats i mean i completly disagree with what your saying but im not going to sit and argue with someone & completly disrespect and bash your belifs i wont insult you or anyting but please try to show a little respect for other ppls faiths

please and thankyou

[heywatsupf]

Dude are you serious?

Are you really that dumb?

Tell me how can a dead person after 2000 years been folded in a shroud, possibly have his face printed on the shroud, 3D!?

It just makes no sense, how come fraud scientist can't duplicate another one as the shroud of Turin?

The Holy Bible says that Jesus is the light.

Even the scientist said that it needed to be a super light to plant Jesus face, it's obvious.

[Porphyrygrampus]

@DasWaldkind1 Everything to do with the Prieuré de Sion has been disproved as the work of 20th century hoaxers from France. But then it's clear from your channel that you are a sucker for esoteric frauds like the Gospel of the Holy Twelve and those pseudo-Essene sects...

Unfortunately for you, de Molay was not crucified (which would have been a blasphemy for the Church) but burned at the stake in Paris, as anyone can check on Wikipedia. But he is a hero-figure for many freemasons, hence books...

[DasWaldkind1]

Picknett and Prince's “Turin Shroud” & Knight and Lomas' “The Second Messiah” state that it is in fact the shroud in which Jacques de Molay, the final Grand Master of the Knights Templar, was wrapped when he was tortured (in a mock re-enactment of the crucifixion) by the French royal torturer; and that the Shroud was seen as affirming deMolay’s Messianic status to followers of Joachim of Fiora ... hence the Church’s decision to distance itself from the relic. (Steven Mizrach: Prieure of Sion )

[Porphyrygrampus]

ChucksterOLove or Huckster...

We're waiting for some facts on the Shroud and the US scientists who spent thousands of man hours investigating it (the Shroud of Turin University Research Project), instead we get smear tactics worthy of Pravda and vituperation without logical argument.

[Porphyrygrampus]

YOU:"Three days is not enough time " but "2000 years would be enough". So produce your proofs. Where are the Shrouds 2000 years old that show such incredible images?

As you've obviously heard of the Resurrection, you are being devious enough to fail to link the Resurrection with the Shroud as a potential cause that would fit in with the "whole history of Xianity".

Oh, and get a new facial character! Sadly that face of yours speaks volumes on your character and degree of honesty.

[arkansasbean]

LOL!!! You are ignorant about the shroud. It has been proven real. I noticed that you had 0 evidence for it being false, you started out bashing it as a child would so no doubt you know no science of, well...anything to do with the shroud or christianity. Also, I am a christian and I will speak to you about the shroud as you calim no one will do..do you accept??? We can put the shroud history to rest scientifically.