1998 Ls1 z28 camaro (stock ) vs Lots
Top Comments
All Comments (110)
-
@svbumminMost Ford and Gm performance cars had freaks . not just cobras and machs . My ls1 dynoed good but it was no ls1 freak.f.Push rod motors a simple time tested monsters. Thats why when you go to to local drag strip . 9 out of 10 fastest cars are old push rod engines. Im not saying there the best. they just have over 60 years of mods ready and waiting .Besides in my races it was there stock/lbolt on vs my stock trim. and i raced more then 1 to give those freaks a chance to show lol.
-
@boondocksaint18 well the 32 valve is a little more advanced, but a pain in the ass 2 work on & more expensive 2 mod compaired 2 a nice simple push rod motor. you'd think the 32 valve being fords performance go 2, they'd have the bugs worked out before the mach, but its not true. there a SVT hand build & still had issues with timing & a couple design flaws. resulting in factory freaks swinging 30hp in either direction. buddies mach ran 297rwhp stock, but it was off a dynojet
-
@svbummin hey now lets no make fum of push rod motors . both the z06 and Zr1 are push-rod. A ls1 fbody stock for stock or mod for mod will normally run close times to a Mach or a Cobra . I have tested it enough to know for sure ; ) . Most the time i found the ls1s to be faster .Or at least mine to be .I Like cobras . i like Mach 1s more lol
-
@dukethewahala well get your head out of your ass & into a 32 valve mach 1 or S/C cobra. my mach has run down my brothers SS with equal mods more than once. the 32 valve responds better 2 mods than a heavy ass pushrod motor, & has better running gear all around. big difference in quality inside & out when its not a production line GT which were junk untill they got the 5.0 32 valve
-
the 90s era camaros are great cars. fast and tons of mod parts available but they are some of he worst looking cars chevy ever made in my opinion.
-
@Andy1396003 cant speak for bottz . But when i made this video my 98 z28 was a stock trim .auto GU3 package . On falcon z rated street tires . best stock time was a 13.23 very cold dry morning at beach bend Kentucky at the end of the season in 2007 . Normally it ran 13.3s 13.4s
-
@bottzxl32 best time to date? auto bone stock right?
-
@bottzxl32 I agree 100%, I rarely see a mustang that hangs with my 02 ls1 camaro. If I do its got ALOT of work, where all I have is a Lid and full exhaust. The new 11' 5.0 and terminators are no joke though, and alot of bang for buck as well
-
@ralatorre9 I Consider buying 1 of those acutely. doesn't change the fact what happen to every mustang before it . I got a very nice car . That dead stock took done any N/A stang until the 2011 Model. Im not sad about that. Im glad Stangs stepped it up a notch its about time.
As far as the 5.0 vs 6.2. The 6.2 is a basic push rod motor cheap and easy to modd. the 5.0 is not. its using tech that BMW used in the 80s to make a 2.5 4 cyle M3 evo motor make 300hp N/A. Good stock power.
-
@jiubi24 2011 mustang 5.0 > 6.2l SS. PWND. With 1.2 Less litres too :3



Truth be told here rather then the bullshit being spoken. After owning bolt-on mustangs starving to run 13's spending lots of cash, I felt pretty embarrassed when every LS1, not LT trim, Ive come across almost always beat be by good distance, I bought my 1'st 1998 Z28/LS1 Auto trim, I couldn't believe the results, Freaking scary screaming monster & very fast. So unless you can afford 03+ Cobra or Mach1, LS1 Is King. I do still love mustang, but cant deny solid results. Tight fit but fast@6'2
bottzxl32 2 years ago 11
GM all day baby. as you can see gm doesnt need supercharger to beat a shitstang...lol
jiubi24 2 years ago 11