Global Warming Basis By Professor Michael Oppenheimer 1/10

Michael Oppenheimer is the Albert G. Milbank Professor of Geosciences and International Affairs in the Woodrow Wilson School and the Department of Geosciences at Princeton University. He is also Director of the Programme in Science, Technology and Environmental Policy (STEP) at the Woodrow Wilson School and Faculty Associate of the Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences Programme, Princeton Environmental Institute, and the Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies.

He joined the Princeton faculty after more than two decades with Environmental Defence, a non-governmental, environmental organisation, where he served as chief scientist and manager of the Climate and Air Programme. Oppenheimer is a long-time participant in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) which won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007, serving most recently as a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report.

He is currently a member of the National Academy of Sciences' Panel on Alternative Liquid Transportation Fuels. He is also a science advisor to Environmental Defence. His interests include science and policy of the atmosphere, particularly climate change and its impacts. Much of his research aims to understand the potential for "dangerous" outcomes of increasing levels of greenhouse gases by exploring the effects of global warming on ecosystems such as coral reefs, on the ice sheets, and on sea level. He also studies the role played by nongovernmental organisations in the policy arena, the role of scientific learning and scientific assessment in decisions on problems of global change, and the potential value of precautionary frameworks.




In the late 1980's, Dr. Oppenheimer and a handful of other scientists organised two workshops under the auspices of the United Nations that helped precipitate the negotiations that resulted in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (signed at the 1992 Earth Summit) and the Kyoto Protocol. During that period, he co-founded the Climate Action Network. His research and advocacy work on acid rain also contributed to the passage of the 1990 amendments to the Clean Air Act. Dr. Oppenheimer has been a guest on many television and radio programmes, including ABC's This Week, Nightline, Alcove, The News Hour, The Oprah Winfrey Show, Charlie Rose and the Colbert Report.

Prior to his position at Environmental Defence, Dr. Oppenheimer served as Atomic and Molecular Astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics and Lecturer on Astronomy at Harvard University. He received an S.B. in chemistry from M.I.T., a Ph.D. in chemical physics from the University of Chicago, and pursued post-doctoral research at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.




Oppenheimer is the author of more than 80 articles published in professional journals and is co-author (with Robert H. Boyle) of a 1990 book, Dead Heat: The Race Against The Greenhouse Effect. Ph.D., University of Chicago.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• environment
• health
• humanities
• economics
• business
• social
• science
• physical
• medicine
• public
• service
• announcements
• state
• government
• regional
• local
• nonprofit
• federal
• grassroots
• outreach

[nancidrew4]

gristmill. grist. org/story/2006/11/19/51921/827

The models predicted:

1. surface warming accompanied by cooling of the stratosphere

2. warming of the lower, mid, and upper troposphere

3. warming of ocean surface waters

4. energy imbalance between incoming sunlight and outgoing infrared radiation

5. sharp and short-lived cooling of a few tenths of a degree in the event of large volcanic eruptions

6. amplification of warming trends in the Arctic region

All of these predictions came true.

[nancidrew4]

In case you have any doubts about the reality of human-caused climate change, this should help:

HOW TO TALK TO A CLIMATE SKEPTIC

gristmill. grist. org/skeptics

There's also this website from a top British scientific academy. They provide responses to the misleading arguments "put forward by those who seek to distort and undermine the science of climate change."

royalsociety. org/page. asp?id=6229

[misshallsschool]

Miss Hall's School is an all girls boarding and day school located in the beautiful Berkshires of Massacpphusetts for grades 9-12.

nitinae

Please subscribe and watch our videos!!!

[Yrkhwulf]

A true scientist would not use fahrenheit.

[avatargrl11]

Nanci... looks like the Hardy Boys were better investigators... mananged to hack into the emails of many of the leading global warming so called 'scientists'... turns out the whole thing is a sham... no need to get your panties in a ruffle any more.

[wilbert1755]

The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States: We cant let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the U.S. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are. And it is important to the rest of the world to make sure that they dont suffer economically by virtue of our stopping them.

Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund

[EasyEs]

For example look at the response for the 1998 was the warmest year on record post. If you choose to belive that only NOAA and GISS are collecting data then sure the last decade has a modest upwards trend. But 3/4 climate metrics show not warming over the last decade and this includes UNISO corrections for the 1998 el Nino. The GISS data base is a mess anyhow and the fact they would not release their methodology for UHI and false logic adjustments is suspect.

[EasyEs]

The models were correct to identify points 1-4. As far as pts 5-6 goes there is evidence that exsists to disagree with this, pt 5 especially.

These how to talk to a climate skeptic sites are nice but they don't go near answering the real important questions regarding climate sensitivity, real big concerns regarding thermal inertia in the oceans. They also cherry pick.