Pantheism - God as universe theory -

I developed a counter-theory that is just like pantheism, expect without the word God attributed to existence. Instead God is just a concept, that can or can't be applied. See universialism.

Website: http://goldenthought.weebly.com/my-books.html

The only reasons to call GOD the universe is because the universe can be described as so from the pantheistic or monistic view point:
A) Eternal.
B) Self-created.
You can call the totality what ever word you think is fitting.
Conscious choices determine the single path the mind's reality will unravel to. Though the future seems like it has yet to happen this is due to conscious experience of itself in increments instead of one singular event. If life was seemed like one event, there would be no reason to read this because you already would have in a single instance. Our minds are bodies programmed to experience ourselves.

There are two thoughts, that everything is fated, and that nothing is fated, but thinking that nothing is fated is really fate. Who made the fate? You, and everything else. It is both made, and is.

It can be said that everything is mistake, or that everything is intentional, eternalism is the belief that all things are intentional, but the mind thinks that whatever it does can be a mistake. For us there is focus and precision which is intentional, and loss of focus and imprecision which comes out as a mistake; but in eternalism even fault in conscious awareness, and life, is intentional, things happen because things are the way they are. There is no true chaos, only those things that seem to happen for immeasurable reasons. (see Schopenhauer)

Everything happens by means of reason, rules, commands, that push along the system. The needed unknown is all that the conscious can not perceive, and if there was not something the consciousness could not perceive (future, infinity, nature of true-self) there would be no finite experience. All the rules fall into place - all the animals live, all the stars shine, and so it is through universe's eternal cycle of being. The universe starts at the Big Bang, and finishes the second before it. The universe, and everything that happens in it, is self-created by interdependency of the totality and the parts. You are not the totality but the parts. Everything is connected by means of reflection, and causation. If the universe didn't bring forth every single cause before you were conceived, you would not be, but you are because of all the causes, and will forever be because of all the causes that came before your present self. Free-will is an illusion to live by, for without will there is stagnation of self (dead matter), and body and mind are meant to labor, survive, and create (alive matter). (See Freud on free-will) The point of all things is the experience of being. As frogs leap, as bees sting, the human is as it is in the womb and the grave of the eternal universe.

God is not a deity, it is the totality. The God that is universe doesn't call for faith, for science is the knowledge of God - of the totality, of the self.

I am a human, and this is eternal life.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Eternalism
• pantheism
• God
• theory
• science
• big
• bang
• galaxy
• stars
• unity
• diverisity
• truth
• universe
• wildlife
• nature
• anime art
• outdoors

[Juefawn]

Hi! Please watch some of my philosophy vlogs if you enjoyed this work. Looking for some intelligent feedback. What do you think of my religion Buddhist Transhumanism, it can include pantheism?

[bewareofdajjal]

The universe is self contaned infinite? Lmao pantheism falls apart right from the begining. Are we or the universe able to create it self? Can we compile trillions of lifeless atoms n molecules to form intelligence or life? No pagans. We are not self created nor did the universe able to create itself from chaos to order. Will you not reason with your heart and reflect upon our surroundings, for that i suggest knowledge is a good start. The sun 2 the ignorant is life sustainer which forms worship

[Tetzukai]

@sirunlalala An organism? No it isn't...

[Tetzukai]

We`re not unique whatever you mean by that and we`re not the same biologically and psychologically as far as evolution, conditioning, and circumstance goes. And we don`t everlast because our consciousness and experience will disipitate into nothingness. The only thing that might make it into the future is the energy that has been accumulated over billions of years. It`s the body, not the ``us`` to put it simple. ``Eperience`` it and lose it, how senseless to the meaning of eternal.

[8osiris]

holographic universe theorey kind of says it all. In effect we are all holgraphic mass.

[coyoteself]

What the universe is, or is not. doesn't matter because with, or with out us, the universe will continue to do what it does. Yet from our puny perspective, the universe is eternal and will be here longggg after mankind has disappeared. But from a cosmic perspective, the universe itself will die out out. Hmmmm but then again, that's accord to physicists. So who knows or cares? Because in relation to we humans that debate is rather moot. Unless...

[sirunlalala]

@Ihatemelee the universe is an organism it was born now its growing/expanding. it may be eternal I dont know but it is finite if it is growing

[1tabligh]

@ItsAllChaos .....and not believe the universe itself is eternal?

___

Matter has different aspects and dimensions; it is immersed in quantity and multiplicity; and it acquires its various dimensions by means of attributes and properties. The necessary being, by contrast, is *free* of all such properties.

[1tabligh]

Imprisoned as we are within the four walls of matter, we *never* encounter anything accidental in life, and, indeed, no one ever encountered, in the history of the world, an accident *not* arising from a cause. Were this not the case, we might have an excuse for regarding the universe as accidental in origin. What kind of accident might it be that from the dawn of being to the present has guided the infinite interactions of all things, in so wondrous, precise and orderly a fashion?