Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Scramjet Test!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
45,967
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 29, 2009

@ NASA Langley Research Center
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/langley/home/index.html
A scramjet (supersonic combustion ramjet) is a variation of a ramjet distinguished by supersonic combustion. At higher speeds, it is necessary to combust supersonically to maximize the efficiency of the combustion process. Projections for the top speed of a scramjet engine (without additional oxidiser input) vary between Mach 12 and Mach 24 (orbital velocity). The X-30 research gave Mach 17 due to combustion rate issues. By way of contrast, the fastest conventional air-breathing, manned vehicles, such as the U.S. Air Force SR-71, achieve approximately Mach 3.4 and rockets from the Apollo Program achieved Mach 30+.

Like a ramjet, a scramjet essentially consists of a constricted tube through which inlet air is compressed by the high speed of the vehicle, a combustion chamber where fuel is combusted, and a nozzle through which the exhaust jet leaves at higher speed than the inlet air. Also like a ramjet, there are few or no moving parts. In particular, there is no high-speed turbine, as in a turbofan or turbojet engine, that is expensive to produce and can be a major point of failure.

A scramjet requires supersonic airflow through the engine, thus, similar to a ramjet, scramjets have a minimum functional speed, about Mach 7-8. Thus scramjets require acceleration to hypersonic speed via other means. A hybrid ramjet/scramjet would have a lower minimum functional Mach number, and some sources indicate the NASA X-43A research vehicle is a hybrid design. Recent tests of prototypes have used a booster rocket to obtain the necessary velocity. Air breathing engines should have significantly better specific impulse while within the atmosphere than rocket engines.

However, scramjets have weight and complexity issues that must be considered. While very short suborbital scramjet test flights have been successfully performed, perhaps significantly no flown scramjet has ever been successfully designed to survive a flight test. The viability of scramjet vehicles is hotly contested in aerospace and space vehicle circles, in part because many of the parameters which would eventually define the efficiency of such a vehicle remain uncertain. This has led to grandiose claims from both sides, which have been intensified by the large amount of funding involved in any hypersonic testing. Some notable aerospace gurus such as Henry Spencer and Jim Oberg have gone so far as calling orbital scramjets "the hardest way to reach orbit", or even 'scamjets' due to the extreme technical challenges involved. Major, well funded projects, like the X-30 were cancelled before producing any working hardware.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramjet

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • speed is not the problem only acceleration and deceleration (both are the same actualy only a matte rof reference frame) are dangerous ( the fall wont kill you , the impact does. to put it that way ^^)

    sory for my bad english ( im not a native english speaker)

  • @9Paradigm: which sucks in planetary atmospheres because you get more thrust from an extinguisher than from an ion engine.

see all

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • If at all we do make ScramJets passenger ready..., how the FUK are we gonna stop this thing, slow it down !? lol

  • @brunofporto

    well in space, the deceleration from friction is almost null or actually null itself, so any acceleration in space will be kept

    like say, if u have that farting engine that gives 1m/s2 of acceleration, the spacecraft will continue to accelerate at that 1m/s2, comparing to IN earth atmosphere, there's gravity to take care of even moving up... and theres air resistance to take care of moving faster and faster, this is not for space as an object can continue to accelerate forever

  • thumbs up for me seeing my first intelligent conversation on youtube

  • @brunofporto: Well, it has very little thrust, but provides it over a very long time.

    A small impulse during a long time can have the same effect as a very fucking powerful impulse over a short time :P

  • @Helge129 I remember a north american professor saying that ion engine have the thrust of a fart ;)

  • LOL, the next thing NASA will be trying out will be smthing like electron gun propulsion i guess

  • @Kivencito

    try to google gforces. it is not affected by speed

  • @9Paradigm

    well, there are 2 totally different uses for those.

    ramjet can only operate within the atmosphere, as it needs air. the VASIMR you talk about can only operate outside...

  • such a nice windtunnel...

    WTB Hypersonic Windtunnel

    22 Dollars and four nickels! Email please

  • @Kivencito g force is caused by rapid acceleration and deceleration. thats why if you travel at 100 miles per hour on the highway at a constant it feel the same as 20 miles per hour in a city.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more