Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Daewoo K7 Machine Gun

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
95,606
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 1, 2008

PASPAMPRES SETIA WASPADA SHOOTING CLUB

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 8 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • do you honest believe that country like Korea doesn't have money to buy MP5? give me a break...

  • Dude. Were talking about real guns not shit video game guns

see all

All Comments (88)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @dba7dba also, when you have a large, industrial country, theres no need to buy weapons from other countries when you can domestically manufacture them

  • @valkyrieXX They do money. But they don't have unlimited amount of dollars. To equip an armed forces of nearly 700,000, you have to control the cost somehow. That's why this gun exists... Otherwise, they'd have just bought MP5 for everyone who needed a K7.

  • that suppressor makes an interesting sound

  • Lean forward dumbass! K1 and the K2 are pretty reliable weapon made by ROKA/Daewoo. They went from making cars, to refrigerators, to jets, and how human ending weapons lol:D

    

  • can you say MEET MY SILENT PARTNER

  • @JunierMahri246 CSA was recognized and had very minor support. Tae-Kwon Do championships there was no NK or SK there was Korea as a body of land. now reply back to my 1 month old discussion.  I don't care

  • @NoNoseProduction The CSA was not recogized as a new country by the world because it had no foreign support and lost the Civi War. North and South Korea is known because it gained foreign support in the Korean War was a draw to the Koreans. I'm Korean and even though I agree with you, HOLYDSFA have some points too. In most of the world sport, North and South Korea combine to be Korea and if you saw the Tae-Kwon-Do world match, there's n North or South Korea but Korea. 

  • Because of this disparity between ideological clarity (albeit employed in opposite terms by the two powers) and practicaly murkiness, the type of debate that @NoNoseProduction and @HOLYDSFA are having is not something that can be quelled with fact clearing or much less name calling.

  • Whether there exist two nations is actually more of a pickle than one might imagine. Both are members of the United Nations, which indicates that the international society acknowledges, at least to some degree, the legitimacy of the two governments. However, the majority of Koreans (on the either side) believe in the necessity of unification, which implies that the current situation of having two Koreas do not indicate separate identities but an unfortunate schism. Think of Civil War era U.S.

  • South officially calls itself Republic of Korea and the North calls itself Democratic People's Republic of Korea. Constitution of each dictates that there is only one Korea, and that the other side is illegally occupied by illegitimate armed forces. Thus, to refer to itself as either South or North Korea would be an act of sovereign suicide for both ruling bodies. Colloquially, however, N/S distinction is most often the case, as well as evidenced in official use for the purpose of peace talks.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more