Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

richard dawkins atheist evolution dvd debate

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
312 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 2, 2009

thoughtful critique of richard dawkins' performance in various dvd debates.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 10 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (miggetymike1)

  • I would recommend taking (or probably retaking) an intensive course in logic. Your name-dropping of logical terminology gives the impression of an comprehension of it, but you often employ fallacies, and at times don't even seem to understand the fallacies you've name-dropped. Some other posters on this thread have done likewise. Don't you agree that you can't make a good argument without adhering to the rules of logic?

  • @wavenaboard Please, give me your strongest example of a fallacy that I employ.

  • Wait are you deleting comments that own your pathetic beliefs? LOL

  • yes, that's why all of the comments you see below are glowing reviews from people who think like me! LOL

see all

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You are absolutely spot on the point of "growing up in a religious family" on whether that has any implications on the existence of God.

  • Do you believe Jesus is there in the room while you are masturbating? If you are a Christian, you are supposed to say "yes", he is in the room, but as a sane human being, you absolutely do not believe it. If you did, you could not masturbate. I know you are a sane human being. You say you believe, but you do not. (as least while masturbating, which you, as a healthy, sane young man, do frequently).

  • ... exactly the point.

    It's not purely random. Natural selection is not purely random, just as the fact that your sperm had a chance to win isn't purely random. You're making my argument for me here.

  • There's plenty of variation for natural selection to work on. Your lack of critical faculties is proof of that.

  • it's a straw man because it's not the theistic argument. It is a similar argument that can be easily attacked without addressing the real argument.

    watch "re: can you trust your thoughts."

  • I'll assume you meant "random chance" and not accident. In that case my response is that it wasn't purely random for the sperm that later became me to have "won." That's like saying the winner of a footrace is purely random-it's not.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more