William Lane Craig on Oscillating Model
Uploader Comments (drcraigvideos)
Top Comments
-
I want to meet this man!
-
I could probably discuss philosophy and theories with Dr. Craig for hours.
All Comments (70)
-
@MegaDude1969 LOL
Make it Dr. Craig and Prof. Plantinga and it would be months...
-
@unapologeticmind "You cannot infer any kind of likelihood or probability regarding God's existence from a purely philosophical standpoint."
Yes you can because a probabilistic inference is a philosophical standpoint.
-
@ebeatworld ooooh man it was agonizing, but also hilarious..
-
He's a good theistic debater, but at times too prone to make connections between purely philosophical arguments and their supposed real-world implications. You cannot infer any kind of likelihood or probability regarding God's existence from a purely philosophical standpoint. You can only prove that God's existence isn't inconsistent with what we know about our world, that's all. The only positive case that can be made for God's existence is by analyzing the merits of specific "revelations".
-
@drcraigvideos I'll second that. Krauss was embarrassing to watch.
-
Is Dr. Craig ambidextrous? I've seen him write with his right hand when taking notes in debates, but here, he is writing with his left hand.
-
Despite of me not being a religious person, this man looks very interisting to talk to
-
krauss and stenger went down and they are top notch physicists. they did horrible in a debate with Craig.
-
@drcraigvideos Not to mention his two debates with Victor Stenger
-
@bm359 He did!? Awesome, can I read morea bout it/watch the presentation?
Interesting theory... He should debate with someone only about physics, not God or religion. He won't stand much of a chance.
kangsan2014 4 months ago
@kangsan2014 Is that why he whipped Krauss? Give me a break. Craig definitely knows more about physics than Dawkins.
drcraigvideos 4 months ago 15