Jean Chretien wants proof

Jean Chretien wants proof

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Jean
• Chretien
• proof

[cancanbiker]

fuck bush. chretien did what was right. I dont care what any dumb Americans or Canadians don't understand about it. Go watch some more fox you brainwashed puppets.

[kanuckmodel]

People are dumb if they cant understand why he is saying it like that. Chretien told Bush to show him proof, evidence, of Iraqs WMDs. Bush ended up showing him 20 year old surveillance. Then the press (remember everyone was going along with Bush and administraiton because you were either eating what they were feeding you or you were a terrorist) were getting on him why he wasnt supporting Bush. Thus he says i saw no proof, a proof is a proof because its proven. he saw no proof. and guess what...

[smdcbeta]

God I miss this guy

[gasper47]

@jeroliver thats nothing, during the iran/iraq war, despite repeated warnings to the US not to park their destroyer over civilian air routes, despite having a civilian marker on the plane, a trigger happy officer shoots it down. kills over 200 iranians (all this while the US is openly supporting iraq). i dont think that officer even got a sentence...any other nation. especially the US would call that an act of war and retaliate...did iran? no.

[jeroliver]

@gasper47 I'll have to look into that. Google USS liberty cover up. This was a US / Israeli false flag operation in which they tried to sink an American ship and blame it on the Egyptians so America could invade the middle east during the 1967 war. This is the worse planned and most obvious false flag operation. Everyone on board knows it was planned. It was completely white washed. I recommend watching a video called Terrorstorm. It's all about false flag operations.

[gasper47]

@jeroliver i know about those contradictions,when armenia went to war with azerbaijan over azer massacres of armenians, the azeris had help from iran, israel and america,not to mention russian, afghans and chechens.israel helped iran during the iran/iraq war...but none of these nations is suicidal enough to attack america, theyre not stupid. and for years america saw them as a corrupt blessing against islamism.bin laden is, nobody says anything about afghanistan, the world was behind the US then

[jeroliver]

@gasper47 Osama used to work for the CIA. There's photos of zbigniew brzezinski meeting osama bin laden. google: zbigniew brzezinski osama bin laden. You've got some research to do my friend..

[gasper47]

@jeroliver ok fine, but it was osama,not the planning but the financing.the planning was done by ramzi yousef and khaled sheikh mohammed, yousef and mohammed bombed the wtc the first time in the 90's with the plan of toppling one against the other..yousef was caught by in 98 and is serving life in new york, mohammed was 02 or 03'. they went to bin laden cause they knew he was a fanatic with a lot of money. obl had bombed some embassys by then. look up 'bojinka plot', reason you cant bring fluids

[jeroliver]

@gasper47 It sounds like you're trying to convince me that Iraq wasn't a threat. U don't need to do that, I know they weren't a treat. The US military industrial complex, Bilderberg group, the CFR and the New World Order needed new wars to expand their agenda. They used 911 to start them. 911 was probably an inside job. It definitely wasnt Osama. And Osama was not killed recently by US forces. It's all lies.

My point was that no one knew anything for sure about Iraq then. It was anyone's guess.

[gasper47]

@jeroliver btw, you have all the reasons in the world for going into pakistan but you wouldnt dar invade that terrorist haven. youre problem is not an arab one, 911 was done by arabs in pakistan, indonesia, afghanistan. all youre problems stem from pakistan which has one of the most government created terrorist groups in the world, most made to kill innocent indians but as long as you dont fix the problem its always going to come back and hit you, and poor iraqis had to suffer..again

[gasper47]

@jeroliver so, in essence, yes youre right, i didnt know for a fact is he had wmd's, but despite the circumstances saddam was complying. he also had enemies in his neighborhood so he couldnt bow down completely. but to assume wmd, to pull inspectors out for war, to play the public (who is too dumb to realize that a threat from iraq is impossible, as is for iran, syria, jordan, egypt, etc..) do you understand what i mean when i say you underestimate war because youve never lived it, youre family

[gasper47]

@jeroliver its not about americas supplied wmd's, because the US was ok with that when iraq used them against iran, it was the threat to america, which every world leader should know, doesnt make sense. secular, islamist hating...and it wasnt about saddams threat to his own people because for years the US loved him for suppressing islamists. and the US didnt have a problem when he was gassing the shit out of iranians so dont tell me the kurds..and talk about assuming, you underestimate war