NASA Ufo STS-75 special analysis ! MUST SEE!

we all know about the tether incident, but this shows you the fading in of the objects in detail.



but why we see always the main ufo object from "above". its like on every nasa footage. can it be caused by the camera? but that does not resolves the problem with the sudden appearing and pulsating.
also while the camera adjustes the relative points change. so cant be some lens effect.

so it's very hard to find a solution for that. i am often thinking about how this objects must look in a 3d but ... not possible ;)
HERE I GOT SOMETHING NEW
it's from http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread342548/pg11
"Hi, I don't post often so sorry for whatever has been discussed. I have observed the NASA footage and am particularly interested in converging lines of evidence. There are numerous things to consider.

1. A poster claimed it's not possible to estimate size. Actually it is possible. Let y be the axis from the observer to the tether. The angle in the xz plane makes no difference to size, the angle in the y-axis does. The ratio of width of tether to length is sufficient to determine the length of space spanned by what is seen, and certain pictures allow good estimates of this ratio. The size can be estimated given the ratio of the width to length of the tether. This point is actually made, in effect, in the question and statement in the footage: "how wide ... seems wider than expect" (this results from angle in y axis i.e. because titling away).

2. The key question asked is: "we can see a lot of star-like things ... a lot of things swimming in the foreground ... can you describe what you're seeing? Answer: well the long line is uh, uh the tether, um and err there's a little ah bit of debris that, uh, kind of flies with us and uh it's illuminated by the sun at such low angles.

Ther are many many problems:

a) the spots are all spherical and wherever the edges are contrasted, they are clean edges. This is not compatible with debris or cosmic dust in far or near field (both can have complex shapes of all kinds) b) the spots move in many different relative directions, which is incompatible with debris emanating from a given region in space and there is far far too much for it to be normal background (space is not so cluttered, remember debris can anihilate satelites) c) the spots move in smooth paths yet not straight lines, some curve continuously, turn, or zig-zag, (relative to fixed tether so not camera) d) the spots have different relative velocities, which is incompatible with them being debris from a common source e) big enough debris would all be sucked into the earth's gravitational pull f) spots do not move eratically as they would if in gas (i.e. not outside of the craft) f) spots with luminance (as recorded by the viewing instrument) greater than the tether are clearly obscured when the edges of both objects are clear, meaning that in those cases the objecs must pass behind the tether e) the very large discs are nearly perfect circles with dark centers and should be easily identifiable if a known kind of debris (there are also several with exactly the same features) f) the edges of the TETHER remain clear when large discs pass (incompatible with out of focus anything passing in near field and compatible with object passing behind in very far fields g) with zoom in or out, the distance of spots from tether remains "constant" and ratios of sizes of spots to size of teather is similar for many spots (I can state more precisely), both utterly incompatible with spots being dust or debris in near field, h) no spots change from bright and large to dark and smaller rapidly as they would in near field i) velocity of some spots changes dramatically and laterally (see below url at 3 mins 14 secs approx from bottom left across), without decreasing luminance j) motion of debris cannot be explained by gravitational pull"

see also:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jz2Hftw-sFQ
same kind of object in google sky

--containing copyrighted content which paranormaltv

Category:

Education

Tags:

• ufos
• nasa
• alien
• sts
• 75
• space
• analysis
• tether
• incident

[Abyyss3344]

@MoronAntidote Wow, here too!? How many videos do you spam with your delusional rants??? You are thee biggest fucking loser on youtube! You need a girl fool.. or are you one of those nasty super fat flesh bodies who is trapped in bed by your own filthy mass and your only "out" in life is to live though your computer 24/7?

Now I just watched a TV program about your super fat type... so I have to ask you something, do you really use a stick to wipe your arse or do you just soil yourself all day?

[bandofthehand]

@MoronAntidote You can’t be more than 14 yrs old, proven by your foul mouth insults. People with true intelligence would never disgrace themselves by engaging in child minded insults, as you have constantly done.

Sadly, I have never "read" anyone so desperately trying to pretend that they are so learned but because you are so young mentally, you can’t control your immature frustrations by lashing out at everyone that "only my theory is right!".... just like my 11 year old does. I truly pity you.

[cc0ldt]

Inter-dimensional crafts popping in and out of this dimension (density) by changing their vibratory rate.

[TheWahreWahrheit]

the song is from don davis and its from some matrix soundtrack

[Cigane21]

Can someone tell me the name of the song its amazing....

[TheBaddog666]

this is actualy very good, it issent giveing a mad cp idea of what or how. just OMG. its the best sts 75 vid yet

[sha370z]

The 2012, 2013, 2014 ,2015 ,2016, 2017, 2018 UFOs will be coming

[standauffish]

MoronAntidote is obviously a NASA shill disinfo agent. He is on a mission, but it isn't working. Anyone that wants to see a full motion study watch this one from LunaCognita. Then the shills can try to explain how those objects move the way they do

watch?v=Q2DVeil21gc

[MoronAntidote]

Thread dead due to the stupidity of it's creators/censors.

Move along people. Nothing to see here except a sad example of how to destroy your own credibility.

LOL

[Weaponseeker]

That's under a microscope

[sebastiansz]

All of you are BS talking about @MoronAntidote, but his analysis make much more sense then most of your "analysis". Simple question to the ppl that believe that they are ETs. Why the "2 miles wide UFO's" are turned perfectly flat circle side to the camera as they would like to show the cameraman "hey, mr cameraman, look our ships are perfect circles with a hole inside". Why ET from different galaxy fly so close? don't such advanced race has a 10000mm lenses or sth?

PS. LOL at the music.