PSYCHIATRY: making a killing of children

PSYCHIATRY: making a killing of children.
a clip exposing the truth about psychiatry

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• cchr
• killing
• children
• school
• shootings
• citizens
• commission
• on
• human
• rights
• drugging
• youth
• kids
• violence

[medmatic]

Please go to Yahoo and type in "Horrible Truth About Psychiatric Drugs" to see a research paper exposing these drugs. Also so the search "Documented Proof Psychiatric Drugs Shorten Lifespan". Be sure to include the quotes. You will learn information no psychiatrist will tell you. These drugs destroy fertility and libido and cause impotence and extream disphoria and obesity. The promote suicide and violence not prevent it.

[sociopathicregret]

Actually, this could very well be because people were taking themselves off the drugs really quickly, which led to withdrawal breakdowns. You also have to take into account population growth : )

[PandaValentine]

I have a physical pain problem that the doctors have still failed to find an answer for. So instead they put me on pain medications, or so I was told. Turns out when I looked all these up after taking them for a year, bouncing from med to med and getting bad side effects, every single one was used as an anti-psychotic medication! I am off all drugs, I'm even straight edge. This is literally terrifying! I want to know whats wrong before I'm thrown on a drug and I want proof! End of story!

[OpenComments]

The first thing you notice about "Dianetics" is that it is spectacularly dull. L. Ron Hubbard promises, in this seemingly endless treatise, that his "modern science of mental health" will cure everything from schizophrenia to arthritis, claims for which he presents no credible evidence whatsoever -- unless you consider merely insisting that you've got evidence to be the same thing as offering it. "Dianetics" IS a phenomenal remedy for at least one widespread affliction: insomnia.

[OpenComments]

You, like many Scientologists, tend to make what might be called the "Argument from My Own Eyeballs". You're saying that if you don't have any audio and visual footage of an actual event, then the likelihood that that event took place should be doubted. If this style of reasoning was ever applied to the legal system convictions of criminals would go through the floor and chaos would ensue because we would be demanding a standard of evidence that is practically impossible to meet.

[OpenComments]

I do not have to try street drugs, do crime or drown to have the opinion that street drugs, crime and drowning is bad for you. The same goes for investigating a destructive and lying cult. I am capable of reading and communicating, and probably most important of all, able to learn from the mistakes of others. The core of the criticism is based on personal experience reported by many former Scientologists and critics who have been harassed by the CoS.

[csurmi22]

I'm focusing on correct information here.

You make the impression you know a lot about the Church of Scientology. Where is your information coming from? Were you part of it?

[OpenComments]

You're focusing on syntax here, and focusing on the wrong thing. But enough of the distractions. If it makes you happy, I will amend my statement, saying, 'L. Ron Hubbard blames psychiatry for World War II and the Holocaust (what he was alive for), and the Church of Scientology blames psychiatry for the Virginia Tech Massacres and 9/11." Happy?

It doesn't matter though. Scientology still breaks up families and harass critics, and David Miscavige still beats people. This has to stop.

[csurmi22]

Dear OpenComments! First, do not change the rules of grammar. When you say "Hubbard (and the Church of Scientology) blames" you did use parenthesis, and you said "AND" which means both of them. You wrote "blames" which means: say or think that someone is responsible for something. So what you wrote does mean that Mr Hubbard said or thought that psychiatry is responsible for 9/11. This is what YOU wrote.

Yet Mr Hubbard died in 1986 and 9/11 happened in 2001.

[OpenComments]

Oh, and since you're so keen on looking up sources, how about this one?

"Somebody on this planet, about 600 B.C. found some pieces of 'R6'. I don't know how they found it; either by watching madmen or something. But since that time they have used it.

And it became what is known as Christianity. The man on the cross. There was no Christ!"

- Scientology Class 8 Course, Lecture 10, 3 Oct 1968 ("R6" refers to an alien psychiatric thought implant)

watch?v=qrMJUDkDWqc

[OpenComments]

No, I did not say "Hubbard said". I said "Hubbard (and the Church of Scientology) blames Psychiatry for".

And it is clear that Scientology is furthering its agenda of hate toward psychiatry and psychiatrists for the sole purpose that L. Ron Hubbard had a grudge against psychiatry when the APA rejected Dianetics in 1950.

Bin Laden was influenced by a SURGEON, not a psychiatrist, and for Scientology/CCHR to use either half-truths or falsities like that, it is wrong. Are you a Scientologist?

[csurmi22]

Dear OpenComments! So lets start you saying "Hubbard said" and now you go back, oh no, he didn't say that. Yes, he didn't say that.

Second, on the video link you sent, (thanks by the way!) the CCHR president said (3:46 / 7:35) about 9/11, to be specific: "As far as if he is 100% behind 9/11 or not, I don't know whoever gonna know, but the point is that ideology of terror came from Bin Laden, who was influenced by a psychiatrist."

So who said psychiatrists did 9/11???

YOU! :-)