TheGEETGuys proves using water as fuel in GEET Reactor

Created on November 9, 2010 using FlipShare.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• FlipShare

[Robertspride]

Thank you for the inspiration. These are demanding times and you proved that we can achieve.

[TheGeetGuys]

@Robertspride Thanks for the nice compliment. 

[KelRigg1]

Good Going Guys. Another video to inspire attention to the world of GEET

[TheGeetGuys]

@KelRigg1 Thanks Kel.  Nice new videos of GEET on your side as well:)

[harpbloke]

you guys do the best work. many thanks for posting these inspiring videos.

[TheGeetGuys]

@harpbloke Thank you. We have another video on our web site which isnt on youtube. Also, the inventor, Paul Pantone has lots more on his web site. We are also on Facebook as thegeetguys.

[MrRichinil]

You are not burning water ! It is simply being pumped through the engine.You guys always have to add gas for combustion.The water is making it run cooler but it wont run on just water !!!!

[bryncomeaux]

there is only one way to run an engine using water without violating the law of conservation it is called a six stroke engine the idea is that after the exaust stroke water is sprayed through an injector into the cylinder the hot metal turns the water into dteam which expands under pressure causing a nother fith stroke which is asteam power stroke the six th stoke vacates the steam and the process is repeated. It is used in large stationary diesel engines

[alainvosselman]

hey geetguys, if what you guy's are doing is actualy real, then, may 'the force be with you'. It looks very solid. Maybe if science has proven that inhaling sigarette-smoke passively, can and causes cancer, and make govrnment ban siggarettes in public places and restaurants, maybe they could enforce a law on the car-industry to start producing only this type of engine, cuz we get cancer from airpolution as wel, combustion engines being largly responsible for polution, right ? Grtz

[morphius2003]

@bryncomeaux That is not true at all. If you have a way to seperate the oxygen and hydrogen contained in water with less energy than you get from burning these gases, you will be able to run an engine without violating the law of conservation. Right?. Thanks and bye.

[justaman6972]

a grand for a demo motor not under load?! That's pretty pricy when the idea is to get this into the hands of the public at a reasonable cost. Sad man sad.

[MrAtrophy]

never mind that its easier to separate the O from the H2 and use that as fuel but water would need over 10,000 degree's kelvin to become plasma , and would take more energy then it ever produced. your vaporizing the fuel burning it and the water vapor passes through the system , i would bet the % of water vapor coming out compare to straight gas is massive. but i doubt you even know how to test that

[H24kool42H]

I have a question. How well does this run at a low idle? every video I see they start to die out at a low idle.



[GunClingingPalin]

@MrRichinil yeah you need to go to the Stan Meyer device to do that :)

[jasonga]

where can I get a plan or drawing for this please????????

[mojokiss]

makes sense to me. the waste energy (electrical/plasma maybe) pulls the water apart and that unstable mix burns along with the rest as an accelerator, etc. a little fuel seems like a good idea to keep from rusting... ?

[mozerman88]

@bryncomeaux Very true. Also, some turbo charged or high performnce NA engines can run a small bit of menthanol and water injected into the intake stream to help stop pre-detonation. You do get a small amount of power from the water and methanol turning to steam like you mentioned.

[mozerman88]

This is the stupidest thing ever. All that your doing is sepearting the gasoline from the water. The exhaust heats up the fuel and water mixture in the "bubbler". The gasoline evaporates leaving only water since the boiling point of gasoline is much lower than water. Then, the gasoline condenses in the coil where it is fed into the engihe. This thing is stoopid and I hope most people realize this is rediculous.