Kent Hovind, Jared, Cytochrome c etc., 06/05, Part One.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
718 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 4, 2008

Cytochrome c, Common Ancestor/Designer, Inferring Design, The Fall of Man, Nation of Islam.
Conducted June 8th, 2005.

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @owensphil Oh, you're a design supporter. I see there is no point arguing with you. Conversation over

  • @JaySmith91

    > I can't be bothered to watch this video again to see what you're referring to..

    Among the idiot comments the caller makes, he claims that getting fat is evidence against design.

  • @owensphil I can't be bothered to watch this video again to see what you're referring to... I guess the caller was atheist and trying to educate Hovind on genetics. Nice personal attack on me though...

  • @JaySmith91

    >Respect to the caller. I don't understand why Hovind is so deeply deluded.

    Oh Kent is deluded but the caller who blames God because some people are fat isn´t.

    You´re just as deluded as the caller.

  • Respect to the caller. I don't understand why Hovind is so deeply deluded. After seeing a few of these, I'm starting to believe he doesn't believe any of his bullshit but just prides himself in trying to propagate his cult for finance or fame.

  • That Hovind dude is a smart guy, he's getting schooled by the best, for FREE!

    Did you noticed how he "pricks up he's ears" when the caller explains how things work?

    The guy is a genius, all he has to do is yell "INTELLIGENT DESIGN" and bum! All of sudden he has people with Ivy League degrees taking the time to explain to him how the Universe really works. Too bad his genius couldn't keep him out o jail.

  • I don't think he understands the evidence. It's not simply the fact that there are similarities. It's the pattern of similarity that is important. And also, why, in the view of a "common designer" would it be necessary for there to be any differences in the DNA sequence for Cytochrome C when it has the same exact function in all of the different species being looked it?

    Ugh! Hovind makes no sense.

    Though I wish the caller had gone in a different direction with the unintelligent design.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more