Conservapedia and Godwin's Law

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,743
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 25, 2009

Conservapedia, a right-wing blog owned by homeschool teacher Andrew Schlafly, is renowned for its constant Reductio ad Hitlerum arguments. Watch Godwin's Law in effect as Conservapedia attempts to discredit its opponents using this sophomoric tactic.

Now with more British-English spelling! Plus, one sound effect!

This channel is growing rapidly!

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @Hyenashowl WRONG--Hitler was not a proponent of evolution, because Darwin did not espouse a "master race" idiocy. If anything, Hitler was an opponent of Darwin, who despised eugenics and slavery--and said so openly--you need to stop listening to Hen Ham and Kent Hovind. Hitler's guru: Alfred Rosenberg, a vitriolic antisemite.

  • And so I believe to-day that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator. In standing guard against the Jew I am defending the handiwork of the Lord.

    (Adolf Hitler - Mein Kampf - 1924)

see all

All Comments (50)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @DarthHater100

    Things don't evolve with a purpose in mind. A cell didn't start out and say "One day, I want my ancestors to be humans." That is just where things took the cell.

    If mutations were beneficial, they stayed (winning the lottery) but much of evolution can be explained by adaptation.

    I'm not an expert on the topic, so I probably can't answer every little question you have. You might want to read a paper on it or something.

  • @someonenobodycares Yes, I understand the stepwise progression Evolution wants you to believe. Now if I said you won a million lottery tickets at once, then it would not fit the evolution model, but winning every day is stepwise. There is a huge lack of transitional forms showing this progression. Sure there are diagrams and hypothetical scenarios but nothing real, it's all in the textbook and evolution has a long history of frauds and lies to indoctrinate their theory.

  • @DarthHater100

    The point was that, as the book would explain (or you could watch a video about it here on Youtube) evolution is like climbing a mountain, as apposed to jumping up the whole mountain in one leap as you imply with your lottery example from your old comment.

    Oddly enough, Christians try to leap up the mountain in one bound by saying that an infinitely complex being needed no creator. That is a lot harder to explain than what us atheist believe, wouldn't you say?

  • @someonenobodycares Okay, Climbing Mount Improbable is a Dawkins book. So what? Is that supposed to be atheism`s bible or something? Sorry, but when your Bible is essentially written by the creator of the universe, like my Christian Bible is, then we'll be on equal footing. When chosing who to believe, man or God, I chose God.

  • @DarthHater100

    Mount Improbable. Look it up.

  • I believe in Intelligent Falling because Hitler believed in gravity. XD

  • @DarthHater100 No I don't what is a miracle?why can't you answer that?Your math is off by the way.any order 100 dice fall in have the same odds your going the wrong way.I don't have a bias to miracles to answer your question I really don't know what one is Tell what qualifies? bettcha can't.

  • @alltiedup217 So you cant answer my questions, but at least acknowledge that you just got totally OWNED by my last post. You know what a miracle is, stop playing stupid. It`s one thing to say that an intelligent being made a thing extremely unlikely happen by design. Like I could take a hundred dice and arrange them all to be 1. But the kind of chance evolution needs you to believe is like finding a winning lottery ticket every 10 minutes for a million years. All by chance.

  • @DarthHater100 do you hear yourself even yap???shock you pump out this total shit day after day.Whats a miracle?tell me how you know what one is?betcha can't.

  • @alltiedup217 As far as the snake, of course I don't believe in talking snakes. Snakes cant talk. But the Bible is talking about something miraculous in nature. On what basis do you have a predetermined BIAS towards miracles? What makes evolution stupid is, get this LOL, they think it happens NATURALLY LOL. That is a MUCH bigger leap of faith. Blind faith. You have to believe in something natural that cant be demonstrated naturally. It`s not even science.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more