Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

:: Noam Chomsky : Two kinds of democracy 2/3 ::

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
10,790
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 9, 2007

Noam Chomsky on democracy, propaganda for democracy, manufacturing consent, media control, elitism, bewildered herd, public relations etc.

Have you supported people in Iowa today?

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • *Head explodes from sheer influx of understanding and truth*

  • Thx for Posting.

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (31)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @ thespacialone: Do you think that the response might be different if the roles were reversed and the working class were suddenly in control over the lives of the super elite, kind of like the movie Trading Places with Eddie Murphy and Dan Aykroyd? The “proletariat” (the working class), holding ultimate power, may become highly organized and self-controlled, while the super elite, loosing all control over their lives, might become volatile and reactionary. Chomsky sees clearly!

  • It is a mass murdering Debt Syndicate, a homicidally insane mafia.

  • Noam!!!

  • LOL what did he (really) say at 6.45??

  • Noam sounds more spirited and forceful than usual here

  • People should just mooooo!!!

  • @PavedStones You make lots of good points, but your contention that IQ relates very much to education is false. Rather, its determinant is overwhelmingly genetic, and this has been proved beyond doubt by testers. State education has succeeded far more effectively at making smart people dumb than the less mentally well endowed intelligent. All education can do is unleash our mental potency (or retard it), but it is incapable of producing it in itself.

  • Just when you think he's going to elaborate and provide some rationale for the ostensibly sham accountability in his (version 1) democracy, he fudges and does his usual about turn, with his populist, but seemingly irrelevant for discussion of the point raised, caricature of "wicked" elitists. Mr Chomsky, history has amply demonstrated that wicked though they may be, elite behaviour and attitudes are relatively saintly compared to those your beloved proletariat voices whenever given the platform.

  • Also, it's kind of a cyclical logic: people are dumb and incompetent to have a say in the management of their own affairs, so we need an elite of rich and intelligent men to run the country, so the elites then are justified to manage them ideologically by dumbing them down and brainwashing with the right message through the mass media, so the population ends up becoming really stupid, so we need more elitism, etc.

    On the overall I think this is not very good and that more democracy is better.

  • Which brings me to my last point, that the dumb masses are often much more reasonable and responsible in their opinions than the ruling elites, e.g. people tend to be always opposed to for example wars etc, obviously unlike the people in charge.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more