If Army Ads Had Health Warnings

This is a parody and not a real U.S. Army ad. You can tell by the honesty.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Army Ad
• military recruitment
• recruitment advertisement
• counter recruitment
• war

[Mathenaut]

@MeanderingBeing

Okay, supergenius. So when the Liberal parties of Canada and Australia start pushing big business, tax breaks for the rich, and slashing public services; they suddenly become 'left wing' policies now? Highschool civics should teach what you don't know. Says alot for American education.

You are a shining example of typical American ignorance. No sense of how the world works outside of how your popular media defines it.

[MeanderingBeing]

@Mathenaut lol FAIL on your part chief. The difference between socialism, communism, and fascism is imaginary... They're all different brands of socialism. Fascism is called National Socialism for a reason, and USSR was the United Soviet Socialist Republic.

[PrivateJoker17]

This is the best thing I've ever seen, I hate that it has received so many dislikes; too many ignorant retardes in this world.

[wiscokiddd]

@shantheman12096 Have you ever died for people you don't even know? When your always loyal goyim to ZioNazis fighting their battles for them while they make hundreds of millions a year selling weapons to both sides, your mind is dead and rotten and only an inhumane shell remains. Once you know the war profiteers and propagandists you will no longer fight for them, if you have any heart and balls you will fight to end the Federal Reserve and ZIONAZI rule over the United States. Merry Christmas

[Mathenaut]

@TaleOfValors

Here's the million dollar question: What relation did Al-Quaida and the Taliban have to Iraq, prior to our invasion?

The opportunity for others to become rich doesn't require the exploitation of the poor and the working class.

I criticize your understanding of history and socialism because you conflate socialism, fascism, and communism in a historical context that is invalid due to your inability to distinguish them.

[TaleOfValors]

@Mathenaut Preemptive war against parties unrelated to an attack on us won't make us safer, however Al-Quaida and the Taliban are quite frankly related to attacks on us. I said that there must be the opportunity for people to become richer then others for the bigger cause, higher life standards for society as a whole. Not that exploitation causes liberty. You on the other hand said that I don't understand a thing about history and socialism and yet you couldn't explain to me why that is.

[Mathenaut]

@TaleOfValors

I'm disputing your claim that preemptive war against parties unrelated to an attack on us would, somehow, make us more safe.

I'm disputing your claim that the poor must be exploited by the rich 'for freedom and liberty'.

And I'm criticizing your ignorance of socialism, fascism, and communism; much less history. By your reasoning, I should criticize capitalism by the assertion that it leads to oligarchy and corporatism, while ignoring the differences between.

[TaleOfValors]

@Mathenaut You can't just state things in a discussion without giving reasonable explanations, it makes your whole argumentation seem non-serious and empty. Also, as history shows, there is not too much of a difference between the practical realization of socialism and fascism (or better: national socialism). The theory of socialism may look better, but comparing the practical realization of capitalism with the Utopia of socialism doesn't seem fair to me.

[Mathenaut]

@TaleOfValors

I do not see how it is relevant. Your being wrong has nothing to do with any position I advocate.

Also, you're conflating communism, socialism, and fascism. Beck may not know the difference, but ignorance is no excuse for you.

As for Occupy, it's funny how you claim they 'got bored' when establishments had to resort to violent force against them because they wouldn't 'give up and go home'. Oh and they're still there. Many of them are war veterans.

[TaleOfValors]

@Mathenaut Well, just telling me how wrong I am without bringing up any reasonable arguments on your own seems a bit cheap. Those people back then risked their very lives protesting against an intolerant regime that didn't accept any kind of opposition, thousands had to die in socialist prisons and borders before they were finally free. Comparing those heroes to the Occupy-movement, of whom most already got bored anyways and returned back to their capitalist goods at home, is plain wrong.