Bat Evolution from Evolution: The Grand Experiment
Top Comments
All Comments (36)
-
This video does nothing to disprove evolution. The absence of something in the fossil record does not indicate that it does not exist. There are organisms that existed that we will never know about. Fossilization is a very rare event where the conditions must be able to preserve the skeleton and turn it into limestone. Most people do not believe in evolution simply because they are ignorant of what it really is. Evolution is simply the change in alleles in a population over time.
-
1:58 Russell Crow's sweedish brother
-
@daNDayati = believes atoms, molecules, and the 4 fundamental forces "magically" made themselves
Hypocrisy much?
How bout you focus on finding that mythical "ape-man shared ancestor" that magically caused the polar opposite (and contradictory) "evolution" of Chimpanzees and early humans. Talk about a fairytale. You evo-religious zealots are hypocritical little twits that I wouldnt even call "pseudo-intellectuals"
Tsk, tsk (finger waving)
-
@DisprovingEvolution oh cool.. the anthropic principle.. (you do know how you use your wiki! or was it the Huffington Post?).. if you had read further you would have seen Roger Penrose state: "it tends to be invoked by theorists whenever they do not have a good enough theory to explain the observed facts." Your Gish Gallop style of argumentation of throwing out half baked theories pseudo scientific theories, misrepresentations, falsities and out-right lies is..well.. expected.
-
@DisprovingEvolution and this design "watchmaker" obsession of yours.. we keep on repeating... it is not a tenable argument.. and by the way.. evolution is not just biological.. it is also cosmological.. and in physics.. which part is anti-science.. and when I show you that oil companies use evolutionary science.. your reaction is to just ignore.. Hypocrisy is not produced through the scientific method... take a few deep breaths.. and think..
-
@DisprovingEvolution you are going to have to better defining REAL science as scientific method rules them all. You will have to show where the method fails.. that, after all, is what validates a theory.. and evolution has been validated through more than one hundred thousand peer reviewed papers.. and the boys (and girls) of the NAS and 90 or more other scientific societies also back the theories findings..
-
I prefer REAL science over anti-science (aka evolution)
Saying "evolution done it" is not a coherent or logical argument. Never has been, never will be.
DNA didnt design itself, just like computer chips and binary code doesnt design itself (both very similar to DNA)
Rather ironic you evo-boys accept design in the following (art, music, books, architecture, sculpture, computer chips, jets, lasers, machines, clothes, and 99% of everything) accept for biological machines. Hypocrisy
@daNDayati
Further destroying your inept and UNscientific arguments is the FACT that this 3rd dimension (which is an illusion that is created with atoms) has LAWS that cant be broken.
The Laws of Physics (the laws that govern this 3 dimensional game we call "life") didnt make itself.
The Laws of Physics are "rules" made by the Gamemaker. The 4 Fundamental Forces (gravity, electromagnetism, and the 2 nuclear forces) didnt just happen by a magical accident.
Understand junior?
DisprovingEvolution 2 months ago 4
@daNDayati
Wow, you're WRONG on so many different issues its hard to take you seriously.
No kid, the 4 fundamental forces and atoms (which are LESS complex than DNA by the way) didnt magically make themselves
Nothing can make itself. Everything in OBSERVED science (something evo-heads cant understand) has a cause and effect
Atoms produce physicality (this 3rd dimension) by producing length, width, and depth. The ONLY thing that dosent contain atoms is energy. Energy is eternal and the cause
DisprovingEvolution 2 months ago 4