Chilling account by a pilot in Holland in 1997 flying by night. In the video (2)there is mention of a "holding" (stated by military)which is called dubious by pilots and the source of the tape.
Een gesprek tussen piloot en traffic control vindt niet op deze manier plaats...
Daarnaast wel grappig dat bij beschrijvingen vaak degene die de 'ufo' ziet daarvoor héél sceptisch was... alsof dat het verhaal geloofwaardiger maakt... (nou ja; wellicht voor enkele naïevelingen)
True, i did not see it was split in 2 parts. excuses for that last remark. For the rest of my writing. i stand by it. holding zone was accepted as an explanation, at that moment atleast, judging from the comments. And true that Zuidlaren has normally a 'holding zone' must have been some 'aero traffic-jam'at the time ;) Say hello to Anton btw
Pay atttention. I divided my animation in 2 parts to fit it to the YouTube standards (UFO spotted by pilot in Holland 2). But thx for the comment anyway.
The socalled "holding" (military input)is a nonsensical situation in this area and laughed off by pilots anywhere here. The pilots conclusion afterwards where evidently that he witnessed something that couldn't be explained by normal standards. Het had a similar event some time later on a boat. He quit flying.
The uploader 'forgot'the end conclusion in this recording. Ther was a 'holding zone'over the area due to heavy traffic, their (controller) conclusion was that the lights and blips were from a few aircrafts that were flying holding patterns. It was unusual to have a holding zone at that location, but nevertheless..nextime post the whole thing, so that others can make their conclusions ?
Een gesprek tussen piloot en traffic control vindt niet op deze manier plaats...
Daarnaast wel grappig dat bij beschrijvingen vaak degene die de 'ufo' ziet daarvoor héél sceptisch was... alsof dat het verhaal geloofwaardiger maakt... (nou ja; wellicht voor enkele naïevelingen)
ThelemicMagick 10 months ago
Zuidlaren has normally a should read: has NOT ....
onehundredmonkeys 4 years ago
And respect for the good job on editing and translation
onehundredmonkeys 4 years ago
True, i did not see it was split in 2 parts. excuses for that last remark. For the rest of my writing. i stand by it. holding zone was accepted as an explanation, at that moment atleast, judging from the comments. And true that Zuidlaren has normally a 'holding zone' must have been some 'aero traffic-jam'at the time ;) Say hello to Anton btw
onehundredmonkeys 4 years ago
Pay atttention. I divided my animation in 2 parts to fit it to the YouTube standards (UFO spotted by pilot in Holland 2). But thx for the comment anyway.
The socalled "holding" (military input)is a nonsensical situation in this area and laughed off by pilots anywhere here. The pilots conclusion afterwards where evidently that he witnessed something that couldn't be explained by normal standards. Het had a similar event some time later on a boat. He quit flying.
pedropicasso41 4 years ago
The uploader 'forgot'the end conclusion in this recording. Ther was a 'holding zone'over the area due to heavy traffic, their (controller) conclusion was that the lights and blips were from a few aircrafts that were flying holding patterns. It was unusual to have a holding zone at that location, but nevertheless..nextime post the whole thing, so that others can make their conclusions ?
onehundredmonkeys 4 years ago