Rach3 - Martha Argerich pt.2

she has more possibilities techniquement than Horowitz but the cadenza is better interpreted by Horowitz. He was magician... But I do like her of course, she is the best successor of Horowitz and the best pianist actually.
Naturally musicality from childhood on and a good technique from the very beginning....

este concierto es inhumano!!! y por si no fuera suficientemente difícil, martha, al contrario que otros, en las partes mas complejas y más duras técnicamente se crece y toca más rápido y con más bravura....es increíble, da miedo verla!!! vaya conciertazo

Es sobrecogedor este concierto. Martha logra transmitir toda la emoción en forma magistral...

At 2:50- orchestra members thinking- dang why didn't I ever decide to play the piano? Piano is bad ass, I will never ever play anything as incredibly epic and thunderous on my viola or piccolo...piano is the way to go...THE virtuoso instrument.

and im thinking - dang, why didnt i practice a bit more ten years ago?

Good technician, and is more concerned with showing off technique than say anything substantial about the music.

It's charackteristic for authistic citiziens that they're not able to reflect what's besides htemselves. You really don't know what you're talking about. I told you so many times that you're counterproductive with your destructive votes. You don't have any idea of music, no taste and no very simple understatement of what you're swallowing about. Just bullshit. Please visit the elemtary school of music and arts to teach your ears and your heart. It's not too late with your mereley 20., greenhorn!

"no taste"? My favorite pianists are Richter and Rubinstein. I just prefer their more thoughtful and insightful approach to music, that's all. No need to get so emotionally worked up...

I think you should learn how to spell before you lecture people.

Fantastic mechanics, not much expression. Perhaps the best is Horowitz-Mehta 1978.