"THE TOWER IS LEANING" declares NYC policeman. This ABC News clip broadcast on 9/11, PROVES ABSOLUTELY there was NO controlled demolition of the World Trade Center Twin Towers. "The Tower is LE...
"THE TOWER IS LEANING" declares NYC policeman. This ABC News clip broadcast on 9/11, PROVES ABSOLUTELY there was NO controlled demolition of the World Trade Center Twin Towers. "The Tower is LEANING" the police see, SEVERAL MINUTES before collapse. A bystander says he saw the tower BUCKLING before collapse. Explosives did NOT bring down the WTC Twin Towers. The Northern Tower was LEANING for SEVERAL MINUTES before it gave way.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Sorry to break it to you, but the world does not exist on the internet.
The world exists in real live.
News helicopters, New York City police helicopters, NYC firefighters, all agree that the building was collapsing in slow motion for 5 to 10 minutes BEFORE the collapse started.
NYC fire chiefs declared that the WTC Twin Towers were severely damaged and were going to collapse 30 minutes before they did collapse.
Damage would not have started until demolition if it were demolition
Watch the video, here on You Tube, "Screw Loose Change" It shows every assertion, and proes why every statmenet in Loose Change is a lie.
Also note that Loose Change was made by a then 18-year old kid, who had never worked a real job in his life, literally in his bedroom, on the computer a few feet from his bed. So if you really want to trust an 18-year old kid, Dylan Avery, you're sad.
Whether anyone believes the buildings were leaning, buckling or whatever, this still does not explain the traces of; the explosive 'thermite', pools of molten lava under the WTC towers, the fact the fire burnt for 2 months after the buildings came down, numerous eyewitness reports of explosions prior to any of the three building collapsing, the free fall speed of the towers, the buildings being reduced to rust... need I go on?
Third, if the building were already failing for 5 to 10 minutes before it fell, then there could not be any demolition. BEFORE the time when explosives might have gone off, the building was already sagging and failing.
Fourth, it is massively documented that the explosions heard were jet fuel exploding in the elevator shafts
Ninth, the building was not reduced to dust, and that would be 100% irrelevant even i it were reduced to dust. Demolition has nothing to do with that.
The dust was DRYWALL -- a very soft substance used to make interior walls. Gigantic amounts of drywall are used in any office building. Drywall installers who sand it to a smooth fit cause the EXACT SAME fine white powder to cover EVERYTHING in the area, their hair, their clothes, tec.... exactly like the WTC on 9/11
But you did say that, and everyone knows that the people "ASKING QUESTIONS' are NOT "asking questions." They are obviously making accusations.
There are entire TV channels, magazines, and books devoted to "How Things Work." Nothing wrong with curiosity or wantign to know how something happened.
But when you are accusing innocent people of a horrific crime, that is not your RIGHT to smear innocent people.
When it is overwhelmingly clear they are innocent, you can't play around
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
The world exists in real live.
News helicopters, New York City police helicopters, NYC firefighters, all agree that the building was collapsing in slow motion for 5 to 10 minutes BEFORE the collapse started.
NYC fire chiefs declared that the WTC Twin Towers were severely damaged and were going to collapse 30 minutes before they did collapse.
Damage would not have started until demolition if it were demolition
Watch the video, here on You Tube, "Screw Loose Change" It shows every assertion, and proes why every statmenet in Loose Change is a lie.
Also note that Loose Change was made by a then 18-year old kid, who had never worked a real job in his life, literally in his bedroom, on the computer a few feet from his bed. So if you really want to trust an 18-year old kid, Dylan Avery, you're sad.
First, there were no traces of thermite. NONE.
Second, thermite is NOT an explosive.
Third, if the building were already failing for 5 to 10 minutes before it fell, then there could not be any demolition. BEFORE the time when explosives might have gone off, the building was already sagging and failing.
Fourth, it is massively documented that the explosions heard were jet fuel exploding in the elevator shafts
Fifth, there was no molten lave nor molten anything at the WTC.
Sixth, it would be 100% irreelvant if there were b/c demolition, incl thermite, COULD NOT cause molten anything longer than 10 minutes afterwards.
Seventh, how long the fire burned has nothing to do with demolition.
Eighth, the UNTRUE "free fall speed" of the towers is 100% IRRELEVANT. The government does not have a magic gravity machine making it fall faster
The dust was DRYWALL -- a very soft substance used to make interior walls. Gigantic amounts of drywall are used in any office building. Drywall installers who sand it to a smooth fit cause the EXACT SAME fine white powder to cover EVERYTHING in the area, their hair, their clothes, tec.... exactly like the WTC on 9/11
witnesses reported RED HOT METAL.
They did NOT identifiy it as steel, only as metal.
So it could be aluminum, which melts at the same temperature that ordinary office fires burn
However, metla that is RED HOT is NOT molten.
Molten metal is YELLOW or WHITE, not red
But controlled demolition COULD NOT cause any thing to be molten more than 1 hour after demoltion.
Once again, the truthers are just thrashing around with no logic
There are entire TV channels, magazines, and books devoted to "How Things Work." Nothing wrong with curiosity or wantign to know how something happened.
But when you are accusing innocent people of a horrific crime, that is not your RIGHT to smear innocent people.
When it is overwhelmingly clear they are innocent, you can't play around