Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

9/11: Absolute Proof NO DEMOLITION at WTC Twin Towers -- "THE TOWER IS LEANING" & Buckling

"THE TOWER IS LEANING" declares NYC policeman. This ABC News clip broadcast on 9/11, PROVES ABSOLUTELY there was NO controlled demolition of the World Trade Center Twin Towers. "The Tower is LE...  
 
Customize

More From: JonathonMoseley

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
10 ratings
Sign in to rate
1,440 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (16)   Options

Loading...
JonathonMoseley (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Sorry to break it to you, but the world does not exist on the internet.

The world exists in real live.

News helicopters, New York City police helicopters, NYC firefighters, all agree that the building was collapsing in slow motion for 5 to 10 minutes BEFORE the collapse started.

NYC fire chiefs declared that the WTC Twin Towers were severely damaged and were going to collapse 30 minutes before they did collapse.

Damage would not have started until demolition if it were demolition
jamessmith888 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Before anyone here forms an opinion on what happened on 911 they should watch "Loose Chnage" and "Blueprint for truth".
JonathonMoseley (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Loose change has been expsed as a pack of lies.

Watch the video, here on You Tube, "Screw Loose Change" It shows every assertion, and proes why every statmenet in Loose Change is a lie.

Also note that Loose Change was made by a then 18-year old kid, who had never worked a real job in his life, literally in his bedroom, on the computer a few feet from his bed. So if you really want to trust an 18-year old kid, Dylan Avery, you're sad.
jamessmith888 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Whether anyone believes the buildings were leaning, buckling or whatever, this still does not explain the traces of; the explosive 'thermite', pools of molten lava under the WTC towers, the fact the fire burnt for 2 months after the buildings came down, numerous eyewitness reports of explosions prior to any of the three building collapsing, the free fall speed of the towers, the buildings being reduced to rust... need I go on?
JonathonMoseley (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Yes, it does.

First, there were no traces of thermite. NONE.

Second, thermite is NOT an explosive.

Third, if the building were already failing for 5 to 10 minutes before it fell, then there could not be any demolition. BEFORE the time when explosives might have gone off, the building was already sagging and failing.

Fourth, it is massively documented that the explosions heard were jet fuel exploding in the elevator shafts
JonathonMoseley (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Yes, I think you'd better go on b/c you're at zero so far.

Fifth, there was no molten lave nor molten anything at the WTC.

Sixth, it would be 100% irreelvant if there were b/c demolition, incl thermite, COULD NOT cause molten anything longer than 10 minutes afterwards.

Seventh, how long the fire burned has nothing to do with demolition.

Eighth, the UNTRUE "free fall speed" of the towers is 100% IRRELEVANT. The government does not have a magic gravity machine making it fall faster
JonathonMoseley (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Ninth, the building was not reduced to dust, and that would be 100% irrelevant even i it were reduced to dust. Demolition has nothing to do with that.

The dust was DRYWALL -- a very soft substance used to make interior walls. Gigantic amounts of drywall are used in any office building. Drywall installers who sand it to a smooth fit cause the EXACT SAME fine white powder to cover EVERYTHING in the area, their hair, their clothes, tec.... exactly like the WTC on 9/11
JonathonMoseley (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Finally, as to molten lava,

witnesses reported RED HOT METAL.

They did NOT identifiy it as steel, only as metal.

So it could be aluminum, which melts at the same temperature that ordinary office fires burn

However, metla that is RED HOT is NOT molten.

Molten metal is YELLOW or WHITE, not red

But controlled demolition COULD NOT cause any thing to be molten more than 1 hour after demoltion.

Once again, the truthers are just thrashing around with no logic
field33P (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I didn't say that... AND I SAID MAYBE... never heard of, I guess...
JonathonMoseley (3 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
But you did say that, and everyone knows that the people "ASKING QUESTIONS' are NOT "asking questions." They are obviously making accusations.

There are entire TV channels, magazines, and books devoted to "How Things Work." Nothing wrong with curiosity or wantign to know how something happened.

But when you are accusing innocent people of a horrific crime, that is not your RIGHT to smear innocent people.

When it is overwhelmingly clear they are innocent, you can't play around

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.