9/11: Absolute Proof NO DEMOLITION at WTC Twin Towers -- "THE TOWER IS LEANING" & Buckling

"THE TOWER IS LEANING" declares NYC policeman. This ABC News clip broadcast on 9/11, PROVES ABSOLUTELY there was NO controlled demolition of the World Trade Center Twin Towers. "The Tower is LEANING" the police see, SEVERAL MINUTES before collapse. A bystander says he saw the tower BUCKLING before collapse. Explosives did NOT bring down the WTC Twin Towers. The Northern Tower was LEANING for SEVERAL MINUTES before it gave way.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11

[krayzeejojo]

I'm completely neutral on this subject, but what's your opinion on the "explosions" that witnesses heard before the collapse? And also the visible puffs of dust below the collapsing sections as they came down?

[JonathonMoseley]

@krayzeejojo Hundreds of survivors reported the overwhelming smell of jet fuel (described as like kerosene, etc) inside the WTC towers GROWING STRONGER CLOSER TO THE GROUND. The closer they moved to ground floor to escape, the STRONGER the smell of kerosene / jet fuel became. So, jet fuel poured down the elevator shafts into the BASEMENT and ground floor area.

This jet fuel did explode, repeatedly.

But the tower fell from the TOP DOWN. Explosions in the basement could not cause this.

[JonathonMoseley]

@krayzeejojo Regarding visible puffs, think about what you would EXPECT to see.

You cannot talk about the evidence without first knowing what you SHOULD see from a natural collapse (caused by a terrorist airplane collision) versus some planned demolition from within.

In demolition, you'd need to see 268 explosions AROUND THE OUTSIDE of the building to destroy the 268 steel support columns around the OUTSIDE.

If you only see half a dozen, what does this tell you? Were 268 columns destroyed?

[JonathonMoseley]

@krayzeejojo Finally, ask yourself this.... how could pre-planted explosives SURVIVE in a fire that burned for 1 hour or 1.5 hour?

If you put explosives in a FIRE of jet fuel, what would happen?

[ryconster]

@JonathonMoseley Not true actually,, C4 would definately go off during the fires but not THERMITE. The fact is that somehow these buildings fell in just over 10seconds.. Freefall time would be 8.5seconds.. That gives about 1-2 seconds of resistance.. But that means that the top 15stories destroyed 85stories to collapse in less than 11seconds.. IMPOSSIBLE.. Jetfuel cant weaken steel 50stories below the impact.. INCREDIBLY IMPOSSIBLE

[JonathonMoseley]

@ryconster Yes, thermite WOULD go off during the fire. But the CONTROL devices for any thermite would be melted or destroyed by the jet fuel explosion and fires.

Freefall would be 7.5 seconds. The buildings fell in 15-17 seconds (two towers).

What is impossible is for explosives and control devices to survive the jet fuel explosion and fire. 100% IMPOSSIBLE. Controlled demolition COULD NOT have occurred at the WTC towers.

[migbee]

@krayzeejojo You think maybe floors collapsing on each other would make a loud sound that could have been construed as an explosion, especially amid the chaos? The visible puffs of dust could be windows blowing out due to thermal expansion and incredibly high pressure from the floors falling on top of each other. There's a million possibilities. It is an affront to science to assume without doubt that it must have been detonations, as so many have suggested.

[Martialartyogi]

well no opinion matters because the fact that noone wants to realy investigate says it all

[mak000013]

@JonathonMoseley

Clearly Sir you are lying and I don t understand why!You cannot believe the things you write I m sure!

[phlyegles43]

@tinzovideo Its not fake, it happened. Word choice is crucial. But you have yet to give me any facts to argue my claims.

[tinzovideo]

@phlyegles43 Ok, you can say that, but look at the other facts proving 9/11 fake.

[phlyegles43]

@tinzovideo This is if you know what is happening in the structure. The heat from the flames fueled by jet fuel and office supplies caused the truss's to lose half of its strength (not melt) Those truss's began to sag and pulled on the outer face and caused the bowing and the top sections of the building collapsed downward on top of the remaining portion of the building destroying other key support truss's and columns.

[tinzovideo]

U suck! This is not proof.

[adriangreen369]

@MoseleyJon hahaha oh wow. I'm sure they photoshopped every single video that you can clearly see Molten Iron and they photoshopped Firefighters saying there were these molten pools of Iron then? You're such an insult I don't know why I even respond to you.

[MoseleyJon]

@adriangreen369 However, there are famously photo-shopped (faked) photographs of the clean-up crew weeks after 9/11, cutting up the wrecakge with torches, made to look like there are poos of something. Comparing the published legitimate photo against the faked version proves it was altered.

[MoseleyJon]

@adriangreen369 There was nothing molten at the WTC site. Reports were that there was RED metal. Molten metal is yellow or WHITE. Reports from eyewitnesses of the color of what they saw confirms that it was NOT molten.

Furthermore, reports do not identify the metal they were talking about. They had no way of knowing what metal it was. We know that aluminum gets red at much lower temperatures and melts at much lower temperatures than iron.