Bill O'Reilly: Why Don't Prop 8 Protesters Target Black Churches?

November 10, 2008 on FOX News

Bill O'Reilly talks to FOX News analysts Monica Crowley and Margaret Hoover a day after proposition 8 protests in California.

More News & Videos:
http://atheistmedia.blogspot.com

-

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• bill
• oreilly
• fox
• news
• black
• african
• american
• church
• christian
• gay
• marriage
• prop8
• proposition
• rights
• religion
• state
• atheist
• atheism

[andrehendrik]

@billieholiday42

the phrase "freedom of speech" isn't in the constitution either . . . but you can't reasonably maintain that the principle of speech is not embodied in the constitution. Just like with "freedom of speech", "separation of church and state" is a principle clearly embodied in the constitution.

[circusmonkey10]

@Kingucktoad Because it says it in "da hoooly baable". Honeslty these people sicken me. GET THE FUCK OVER IT. We created what is known as marriage, not your God, because your God probably does not exist. We created marriage and the 'laws' surrounding it, we can change them. Honestly who gives a shit if two guys want to suck each others dicks, nail each other in the ass and/or get married... I certainly don't. GO AHEAD. It doesn't change one single thing about YOUR life. (Love being Canadian!)

[CWScott24]

No one has the right to marry a member of the same sex....therefore the "equal rights" argument is invalid.

[andrehendrik]

@SkeksisRule I know -- that's what I was saying in my earlier comment, that the principle of separation of ch & st is embodied in the Constitution, even though it isn't phrased as such

[SkeksisRule]

@andrehendrik It’s true that the actual words “separation of church and state” aren’t in the Constitution. But the principle of separation clearly is.

The establishment clause of the First Amendment (“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”) prohibits government entanglement with religion — a principle of religious freedom described by Roger Williams, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison as “separation of church and state.”

[Norwification]

To whoever billieholiday42 is; "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" can not be interpreted as anything but a separation of Church and state.

To argue otherwise is to dismiss manifest pronouncement by the drafters of the Constitution, which is to be flagrantly intellectually dishonest simply because you know the facts are against you and you play dumb to avoid having to deal with those facts. Case closed.

[bosseswearblack]

But the Black made up 10% of the vote. 70% of 10% Bill... and they give this bigot a show, like he really needs a platform to spew his ignorance.

[Sileni]

@Fireflygamer Homophobe is nothing more than pejorative loaded wordiness; sensitive politically incorrect pop-psyche jibberish is all just another form of abusive ad hominem towards those not afraid to question something, disprove my previous comment than will apologize. I guarantee you are not able to.

Wait, insecurities? What are you like 5? The ORIGINAL terminology is homoerotophobia...

[Sileni]

@Oaklandgirlpitlover1 lmao. Well you got to if your living in drug-infested zones where even the police officers value their lives more than honoring the code in which they placed their hands on a stack of bibles, sworn to god to uphold the law and even die in the line of duty in protecting its citizens. Then again. Sometimes self-reliance, self-preservation, and protecting your children at all cost will play an even bigger part than depending on others for help!

[Sileni]

@lover3344 Neither does the LGBT community; Still, does let you know that there's something rather fishy going on underneath politically rather than on the surface. Its my guess, O'reilly speaking somewhat candidly on blacks behalf, usually is a tell sign he's fully aware of what's TRULY going on but just playing his part like all the other News Anchors in dumbing down the masses.