Three Nights At Ground Zero

"Three Nights At Ground Zero" is based on the personal experiences of two volunteer rescue workers at Ground Zero during the week of 9-11. The film transitions from still images to moving pictures, culminating in a video shot underneath the ruins of The World Trade Center by an Anonymous Firefighter. We were all searching for our own role in the tragic events of 9-11. It is the intent of the filmmaker to help provide closure to those who wanted to be part of the rescue effort at Ground Zero but were unable to do so. "Three Nights At Ground Zero" was secretly shot on an array of different formats and equipment by rescue workers, all while avoiding the NYPD, the FBI, and the United States Army

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Ground Zero
• 9/11
• WTC
• debris
• rescue
• recovery
• pile
• rubble
• World Trade Center disaster
• volunteer

[mrstuperstefan]

@tntruther Okay. You are all set.

[tntruther]

@mrstuperstefan

I can scientifically prove controlled demolition. All the following were present: Sudden Onset, Sounds of Explosions, Horizontal Ejections, Pulverized Concrete, (Almost) Free-Fall Speed, Total Symmetric Collapse, Melted Steel and Molten Iron; …All characteristic of controlled demolition. ...do the research. AE911Truth

[mrstuperstefan]

@tntruther All you are doing is PARROTING what you've been told.

The WTC was designed like no other buildings before.

Several tons of molten iron? Really? I mean REALLY? Come on. You can call me a sheep all you want but I'm sure everything you've written was copy and pasted from somewhere else.

You are bthe paranoid sheep. "BaaaaaaaaaWHAT WAS THAT?"

[tntruther]

@mrstuperstefan Continued:

1200 foot dia. debris field: no “pancaked” floors found

Isolated explosive ejections 20-40 stories below demolition front

Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame

Several tons of molten iron found under all 3 high-rises

Evidence of thermite incendiaries found in steel & dust samples

FEMA steel analysis: sulfidation, oxidation & intergranular melting

No precedent for steel-framed high-rise collapse due to fire

watch?v=OQgVCj7q49o

[tntruther]

@mrstuperstefan Evidence

WTC Twin Towers Evidence for Controlled demolition.

Nearly free-fall acceleration through path of greatest resistance

Improbable symmetry of debris distribution

Extremely rapid onset of destruction

Over one hundred first responders reported explosions & flashes

Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally 600 ft at 50 mph

Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking

Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds

[tntruther]

@mrstuperstefan FAILURE ANALYSIS?

Yeah! NIST won't release their FAILURE ANALYSIS model!

AND, they refused to test for explosives. I wonder why.

Well, when you ask them why, they say it is a matter of "national security".

Convenient, isn't it. They can basically say anything and then claim that they don't have to prove anything because they can claim their test numbers are a matter of national security.

[mrstuperstefan]

@tntruther Yeah. I went there. I read everything I've read before. It (to me) is obviously a business trying to ,make money off of dupes like you.

SAY.! I wonder how the ARCHITECT feels on the subject. What about FAILURE ANALYSIS. What do they say?

And I'm calling you an idiot because anyone who believes this crap is one. The one thing I know about this world is that propaganda works. Both government and private. I trust neither.

You are a sheep. Not me. I trust neither source

[tntruther]

@mrstuperstefan

Deny, deny, deny and call people names. That's all you do.

You didn't even go look at the evidence page at ae911truth . org

If you're not willing to look at the evidence then you lose.

[mrstuperstefan]

@tntruther No, you dumb idiot. You see, we SAW the planes, we SAW the buildings collapse, we SAW the documentary (made with the architect),

It is YOU that need some evidence.

You have NONE. You are as bad as the chemtrail people.

Evidence. real, physical evidence. I have no trust or faith in the government and am more than happy to assign blame where it belongs but you KNUCKLEHEADS say the same stupid things.

There would be lots of evidence. Lots and lots and lots.

Not just your imagine

[tntruther]

@mrstuperstefan

That is a priori argument.

I bring physical, video, scientific,

furinsic impirical evidence of physics

to support my claim of controlled demolition.