Irena Koblar, Scarlatti Sonata K. 450 in G minor
Top Comments
All Comments (68)
-
brilliant!
-
fap fap fap
-
Pogorelich learned music in Russia. There was no baroque period in this country. The first two Russian composers took lessons from padre Martini and Baldassare Galuppi who are evidently representatives of early classicism. So in Russia people know nothing about baroque and don't understand it. What about conservatories... it can be called with one word: obscurantism. All stupid and chauvinist cliches of the XIX are alive there. Sometimes I regret Landowska did her crusade to the West.
-
I love both! I'd buy both cds.
-
Agree this is even better than Pogorelich's interpretation. Less mechanical and more musical. Bravo!
-
really fantastic!!! interpretation really gooddddddd!!!
lol
-
really fantastic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!! -
Very, very touching!
-
***sparkling*** ornaments and great interpretation...
-
Sincerely I apreciate the great pianist but BUT i cannot make the digestion of the piano instead of the harpsichord. The piano in the barroque period sounds very heavy, sad, and without the freshness, the cristalline sound and hapiness of the harpsichord. well enjoy if you like it.
All musical interpretation is subjective. Among thoughtful people, there is always room for dissent ... for me, Koblar's reading is superb because she seems more interested in playing the music and less interested in proving her virtuosity. For Scarlatti, I this is the approach that I like best.
MikeInBeantown 2 years ago 19
it's wonderfull!!!
deutschland2002 4 years ago 8