Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

\ / ][ |\| y |_ (1965) 3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,715
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 22, 2009

On perhaps the opposite end of the spectrum in terms of sleekness is Andy Warhol's dirty, ragged Vinyl, his film adaptation of Anthony Burgess' novel A Clockwork Orange. Fans of Kubrick's version from 6 years later would probably have a hard time at first recognizing the story amid Warhol's static mise-en-scène and the stilted, halting performances of his untrained actors. Factory regular Gerard Malanga plays the lead, Victor, in one of the most hilariously bad performances ever put on film. He sounds like he's auditioning, poorly, for a high school play, and the other actors aren't much better. The exceptionally long takes don't help matters, as flubbed lines and stammers are left in along with blank moments while the actors search for the next bit. Clearly, realism and emotional investment are far from Warhol's mind here; all the actors show about as much interest in the story as they would in a gum wrapper on the street. This disconnection is coupled with Warhol's decision to film the entire thing from a static viewpoint. There are just three shots in the hour-long film, and all the "action" is limited to one tiny corner of a room where all the characters are crammed into the shot. The net effect is that the story becomes curiously flat and affectless, mirroring the numbing of Victor's mind that accompanies his transformation from bad to "good."

In Warhol's version of the story, form and content are truly married; if Burgess' story is a parable on the dangers of removing free will, Warhol sets this story in a framework within which the viewer has near-complete freedom. Warhol fills the screen with characters who mostly loll around, acting tough and smoking, dancing, and torturing others. All these activities attain a roughly equal status, and the eye naturally glides around the whole area, taking in what all the different people are doing. Part of this is that the story is so slack, and the attention necessarily wanders at times away from the central action. There's plenty more to occupy the attention besides Victor's story, as Edie Sedgwick lazes seductively off to one side, smoking and dancing, and in the background a pair of thugs systematically beat and torture a man they captured. As the film progresses, this latter bit of action parallels and reinforces the government-sanctioned torture of Victor which rehabilitates him by sapping his free will. Vinyl is a strange and intriguing film which, like most of Warhol's movies, often toes the line between slow and downright boring. This is an alienating, attitude-based cinema, and it provides no easy pleasures. By replacing the conventional narrative drive with a cluttered mise-en-scene of bodies, Warhol achieved unusual effects not often seen in film, and certainly not in the (ostensibly) narrative cinema.

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @smurfman95 That's true. It's definitely bare-bones. I think he tried to get the rights to do Burgess' book and was denied, so he did a kind of ripoff...lol.

  • @fuzzballzz36 Didn't compare it to Kubrick obviously his is going to have a much larger budget as well as an actual keen eye for Film Making, I never put this film down you really got defensive over nothing all I did say about it was you'd have to know the story of A Clockwork Orange extremely well to even realize that's what this is lol, Lack of all english culture lack of costume,scenery and nadsat, it wouldn't be easy to draw the comparison to someone unfamiliar with it.

  • @smurfman95 It's more conceptual..you can't really compare it to Kubrick's film. Andy always said (according to those who were there) that he didn't want his films to look professional--he wanted it to be obvious that it was a movie, that it was fake. I suppose you could compare it to Brecht or bring in something like Peter Shaffer's Equus, where the actors wait on benches to get up and say their lines. It pretty much depends on whether you like abstractions like that or not.

  • "mirroring the numbing of Victor's mind that accompanies his transformation from bad to good"

    Virtue out of mediocrity? :P

  • I definently see the plot its very very very thin.....Ud have to know the book as well as Kubricks film well to catch on to it....to bad its all filmed in this corner with all the characters on screen just waiting for their scene to come up.

  • This film makes Ed Wood look like Steven Speilberg!!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more