Frank "HIV positive" to "HIV negative"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,946
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 13, 2010

I met Frank at an HIV support club just outside Kampala in 2009. After being there for some time I learned that Frank is "HIV negative". Today he tests "positive" and explains why here. His English is poor which is why there are some subtitles missing but one can get the points he makes.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (ricci1007)

  • for some reason it wouldn't let me reply directly to you ricci, but anyway i must say you are a lot easier to talk to than a lot of other people on here, anyway take er easy man.

  • @hitcan79 No problem replying at this end. Perhaps a reason people are not easy to communicate with is because they don't stick to facts. Leave House of Numbers aside the growing contradictions, inconsistencies and ommisions remain as thorns in the side of what we have been fed as baby talk for 30 years. Starting with the tests; they have not ''saved''' lives, but harmed and killed. Abortions, divorces, murder and suicides. More so in Africa of course.

  • No vaccine, no safe treatment, no cure, no questions after 30 years ! Isn't something ary? In House of Numbers: Anatomy of an Epidemic, an AIDS film like no other, the HIV/AIDS story is being rewritten. This is the first film to present the uncensored POVs of virtually all the major players; in their own settings, in their own words. It rocks the foundation upon which all conventional wisdom regarding ‘HIV/AIDS’ is based. /watch?v=_p-ttLfkZHQ

  • Not surprised, since these tests are totally inaccurate and not even testing for a virus!

  • The Emperors New Virus? - An Analysis of the Evidence for the Existence of HIV (Documentary)

    watch?v=PQFxratWh7E

Top Comments

  • @hitcan79 Why? Those tests were never scientifically validated. You may as well be suggesting EVERYONE go and get an e-meter reading. DAs are having to throw their "hiv" criminal cases out of court because criminal defense attorneys have got a hold of the test kit disclaimers. It's only a matter of time before the personal injury attorneys do too.

see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @hitcan79 And here...I made a couple of videos about that fraudster Concordance the anonymous youtube scientist. You should be less gullible and stick to REAL scientists with identities and credentials that are easily verified

    see on youtube......C0nc0rdance aka JoeMarkLawson the anonymous youtube "scientist"

    and.....re: c0nc0rdance the anonymous youtube "scientist's" refs for What's the Harm: Eliza Jane Scovill

  • Here's a stipulation about which group should be tested, EVERYONE should get tested, that's what I think

  • @hitcan79 You didn't stipulate which group of people should test. You wouldn't want to discriminate now would you. I agree get all those ''confirmed positive'' t people, on meds/not on meds o retest and perhaps we can celebrate seeing how many have miraculously ''cured'' themselves.

  • @hitcan79 So we are both in denial about safe vaccine , safe treatment , cure or how ''HIV'' actually infects T cells? Its comforting to know that we can agree on something isn't it? How many leading ''experts'' are there working on these ''challenges'' on behalf of our health?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more