1 Of The Best sounding Stang

5.0 is king. Even though i have a 4.6. oh and yes..- Car belongs to "Killer95Stang" on youtube.

Description
s fresh 306 went in. Combo was GT40p heads, RPM2 intake, custom cam, BBK lt headers, Dr Gas X pipe and bassani BX mufflers

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• xpipe
• stang
• 5.0
• MAC
• LT
• Bassani
• Streets
• Mustang

[billy1427]

@SpmStompsAll too bad 4.6's dont have the torque 5.0's do.

[FixFalcon]

@billy1427 Yep, you are correct the 2011 5.0s have more torque than the 4.6L.

[emericask822]

this video makes me want to buy a 95

[need2speed94]

@fullmetaljacktt They can actually run anywhere from 12.9 to 14s in bad weather/high altitude and a bad driver lol. And yes straight axle is much better for straight line performance, that's why I don't like the new 5th gens at all. And all the IRS on the 5th gens does is weigh them down, because obviously it doesn't help a damn bit on that track hah, they blow for circuit racing. Power to weight is important, but its a lot cheaper to lose weight (what GM needs) than add power (what Ford needs).

[fullmetaljacktt]

@need2speed94 a lot of people have a different opinion of stock. As far as i know the fbody zs where running mid to high 13s from the factory. I really never kept up with it because no one leaves their car stock anymore anyway. most drag racers prefer straight axle to irs..i like how you keep saying its purely power weight ratio...thats the whole point isn't it? the more you weigh the more power you need...it's chevys fault for making their car too heavy or not putting the power there to pull it

[need2speed94]

@fullmetaljacktt Uhh I don't think a foxbody or SN95 5.0 could EVER hit 12s BONE STOCK you said bolt ons lol. *maybe the SN95 5.0 cobra, maybee. And yea, chevy made a smart decision to drop a motor that they thought wasnt good enough. Ford just used a new design that they thought was good and really wasn't lol. And yes the new GT 5.0s are very quick, you cant deny that. But the only reason they 'beat' the new SS is purely power - weight. I say its the IRS but who knows.

[fullmetaljacktt]

@rocco23554346 corvettes and mustangs...like apples and oranges...corvettes are nice no doubt ford doesnt market too much into the two seater lightweight cars unless you look at the ford gt. honestly im more impressed with the supra...can push 700+ hp on stock internals. I had an older camaro at one point. I will give it credit it was hard to break(at least the engine was). I am still waiting on the day ford and chevy make an awd camaro or mustang...that would be heaven

[fullmetaljacktt]

@need2speed94 its according to what you call bone stock...there are 5.0s that hit in the 12s and even elevens with nothing but bolt ons and n/a so i dont know what you are talking about. its still a 5.0 vs a 5.7...where are the chevy 5.0s? oh thats right they stopped making the 305 cause they were crap. What about the new 5.0? Thats what i am interested in. theres more to it then just hp and torque btw

[rocco23554346]

@fullmetaljacktt corvette been on top for how many years

[need2speed94]

@fullmetaljacktt And we are also outperforming boosted Ford motors on all motor XD. LS1 f bodies can hit high 12s in bone stock form. No Ford from the 90's can ever dream about that. And stop talking about HP. HP is not nearly as important a torque. HP sells the car and gets idiots like you to become attracted to a vehicle. But out racing, torque is what wins the race. And for the 351w, thats a decent motor... except it can only hold maybe 500hp before you have problems. Crappy 2 bolt mains.

[fullmetaljacktt]

@need2speed94 you are making 14 more hp with 74 more cubic inches...you act like thats impressive lol...i too would love to see a 351w stuffed in the mustangs but for some reason what we want never happens

[fullmetaljacktt]

@rocco23554346 lol rage some more...for 25k-40k more your corvette can outrun a gt500...congrats on the .7 of a second in the quarter mile you gained for 40k lmao