Windows Movie Maker vs. Sony Vegas vs. Audioswapping
Uploader Comments (HyperCorruption)
Top Comments
-
omg -.- sony vegas is rlly better then windows movie maker... all the persons that like wmm more then vegas are just nonskilled persons -.- tried both wmm and sony vegas pro 9 and VEGAS IS WAY BETTER FFS
All Comments (132)
-
Sony Vegas Works alot better for HD WMM kinda sucks because the sound quality Is Garbage and its shit a saving movies (It depends on the computer you have to right?)
-
broring
-
SOOO MUCH MARIOSSS LOL!! I VOTE FOR BOTH CUZ WMM IS EASY TO USE AND SONY VEGAS ISNT THAT EASY AND SONY VEGAS HAS MORE EFFECTS THEM WMM NICE VIDEO
-
Vegas FTW!
-
Windows Movie Maker is free, Sony Vegas is not... Windows Movie Maker may have some promblems, but atleast it comes with your computer... Plus I just think its better, this is my opinion.
-
Ok all I have to say is that windows movie maker SUCKS ASS!



Rendering in HD on widows movie maker take like 30mins depending on the video sony vegas takes 1-3 hours depending on the video still Vegas is way better like a god windows movie maker is a dick bleeding so badly
halo360warrior2 1 year ago
@halo360warrior2 this video is a dick bleeding so badly
HyperCorruption 1 year ago
@HyperCorruption no this video awesome
halo360warrior2 1 year ago
@halo360warrior2 no this video suck
HyperCorruption 1 year ago
3 things about this video are great.
1) The title.
2) When Matthew said "Shoot, Metaknight", it sounds like Matthew is unhappy because Metaknight is hear. (Like "Shoot! It's Metaknight!). OR Matthew wanted to get shot by Metaknight.
3) S2D sounds like STD.
You are a god among machinimists.
Pixlking 1 year ago 2
@Pixlking I disagree. The only reason I'm leaving these videos up is for two reasons.
1. Nostalgia.
2. Other people seem to like them, so I won't deny them that.
HyperCorruption 1 year ago