Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Evolutionists are Exposed and Vicious

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
7,988
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 5, 2007

In every such instance I'm aware of, the suppressed scientist is a Christian, whether Protestant or Catholic. Meanwhile, among members of the prestigious National Academy of Sciences, 95 percent of biologists identify as atheists or agnostics. The fact of their religious (or irreligious) beliefs doesn't invalidate their scientific opinions. Nor should the religious belief of Christians cast their otherwise sterling scientific training and acumen into doubt. However, in academia, it is understood to do just that.
The Martin Gaskell Case: Not an Isolated Incident - http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/258892/martin-gaskell-case-not-isolated-...

A Creation Challenge to the Chickens of Evolution - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhkqJry3iBM
A Warning from a Prominent Evolutionist 1996 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-n8tqBPFYI

NASA Lab Violates Free Speech Rights of Acts & Facts Author - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEW3syy-qRk


Tyrants and Censorship: They Devour Their Own! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCHZbidetoY

More Tyrants and Censorship - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8h-XAqZxLG4

Darwin: Pseudo-Science and Racism - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBbrfNmuXsY

"I argue that the 'theory of evolution' does not make predictions, so far as ecology is concerned, but is instead a logical formula which can be used only to classify empiricisms [theories] and to show the relationships which such a classifications implies...these theories are actually tautologies [a needless repetition of ideas] and, as such, cannot make empirically testable predicitions. They are not scientific theories at all." *R.H. Peters, "Tautology in Evolution and Ecology, "American Naturalist (1976), No. 1, p.1 [emphasis his].

"Unfortunately, in the field of evolution most explainations are not good. As a matter of fact, they hardly qualify as explaination at all; they are suggestions, hunches,pipe dreams, hardly worthy of being called hypotheses." *Norman Macbeth, Darwin Retried (1971), p. 147.

"I have always been slightly suspicious of the theory of evolution because of it's ability to account for any property of living beings (the long neck of the giraffe, for example). I have therefore tried tried to see whether biological discovereries over the last thirty years or so fit in with Darwin's theory. I do not think they do. To my mind, the theory does not stand up at all." *H. Lipson, "A Physicist Looks of Evolution, "Physics Bulletin 31 (1980), p. 138

"The hypothesis that life has devoloped from inorganic matter is, at present, still an article of faith." *J.W.N. Sullivan, The Limitations of Science (1933), p. 95

Quotes by Evolutionists Against Evolution
Appendix - http://www.warneveryone.com/appendix.htm
Cows to Whales - http://www.warneveryone.com/whale.htm
Dino to Birds (Archaeopteryx) - http://www.warneveryone.com/dino_to_birds.htm
DNA and RNA - http://www.warneveryone.com/dna_rna.htm
DNA and Protein - http://www.warneveryone.com/dna_protein.htm
Earth Age - http://www.warneveryone.com/earth_age.htm
Fossils - http://www.warneveryone.com/fossils.htm
Fruit Flys - http://www.warneveryone.com/fruit_flys.htm
Giraffe - http://www.warneveryone.com/giraffe_long_neck.htm
Horse - http://www.warneveryone.com/horse.htm
Inaccurate Dating Methods - http://www.warneveryone.com/inaccurate_dating_methods.htm
Lucy - http://www.warneveryone.com/lucy.htm
Mathematics, Probabilities and DNA - http://www.warneveryone.com/mathematics_probabilities_dna.htm
Mutations - http://www.warneveryone.com/mutations.htm
Natural Selection - http://www.warneveryone.com/natural_selection.htm
Neanderthal - http://www.warneveryone.com/neanderthal.htm
Second Law of Thermodynamics - http://www.warneveryone.com/second_law.htm
Sickle-Cell Anemia - http://www.warneveryone.com/sickle_cell_anemia.htm
Soup - http://www.warneveryone.com/soup.htm
Spontaneous Generation - http://www.warneveryone.com/spontaneous_generation.htm
Universe - http://www.warneveryone.com/universe.htm
Vestigial Organs - http://www.warneveryone.com/vestigal_organs.htm
Much more from The Evolution Handbook - http://www.evolution-facts.org/Handbook%20TOC.htm

Debates Generate Vigorouse Response - http://www.icr.org/article/70 .

Quotes by Evolutionary Scientists Against Evolution - http://www.warneveryone.com/evolution_scientists_quotes.htm

Live broadcasting with instant message - http://www.justin.tv/warneveryone

KJV1611 Bible - http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=authorizedversion&search=Search

The Institute for Creation Research equips believers with evidences of the Bible's accuracy and authority through scientific research, educational programs, and media presentations, all conducted within a thoroughly biblical framework.
info@icr.org
http://www.icr.org

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @flintrox Your joking right?

  • @JesuismyKing Predictions of creationism:

    1. Earth is young. Falsified.

    2. No change will exist between organisms over time. Falsified.

    3. Pseudogenes should not exist. Falsified.

    4. Organisms should be ideally adapted to their environment or human use. Falsified.

    5. Organisms should be similar when filling similar niches. Falsified.

    6. Phylogenic classification of life should be impossible. Falsified.

    If these predictions are not made by creationist, please provide the "real" ones.

see all

All Comments (1,109)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • If creationists truely supported science, they'd apply science to their religious beliefs, and test their beliefs in an attempt to prove them wrong.

  • you fucking creationists are precisely the reason we're still held so far back religion must be abolished, it must be recognized as an ancient superstitious cult, and abandoned before we begin our true progress as a species. I'll say it proudly, death to all "gods"

  • creation science is the ultimate oxymoron. religion is poison and the believers are so blind it's sad... denying the FACT of evolution and lack of need of a creator is to deliberately put the yolk on your own face... i dont have to say it though, you'll learn someday..

  • @JesuismyKing 5. Organisms on islands and other remote regions, especially birds, will be unique globally. Verified.

    6. Geographically close organisms will be more similar than organisms sharing a common niche far away. Verified.

    7. New species will develop from older ones. Verified.

    8. Ring species will exist. Verified.

    9. Rapidly changing environment will result in higher mutation rates. Verified.

    10. Organisms will contain pseudogenes. Verified.

  • @JesuismyKing Evolution is ALSO testable. The requirement for a theory to be tested is that it can make useful predictions. Evolution makes many predictions, most of which have been verified:

    1. All life has a common genetic code. Verified.

    2. Related organisms have similar genetic code. Verified.

    3. Related organisms have similar biochemical functions. Verified.

    4. Organisms will exhibit gradual change over time in fossils. Verified.

  • @JesuismyKing "The evidence for evolution is practically non existent." That is, excluding genetic similarity, biochemical similarity, phylogenies, fossil similarities, embryonic similarities, and plenty more.

    I guess the 10,000 daily papers on evolution are devoid of information, huh?

  • @JesuismyKing Evolution is testable and has been observed. Science does not seek to prove things, so we do not expect this to apply to evolution.

    Alleles frequencies have been observed to change. This is one part of evolutionary theory.

    Moreover, numerous new species have developed in historical periods through speciation.

  • Evolution is untestable, unproven and unobserved in any species on any level. It is unproven... this is a fact. The evidence for evolution is practically non existent. It is impossible to accept evolution knowing there is zero evidence for it, it can not and never has been observed, It is untestable and can never be tested. It is a pseudoscience requiring blind faith. Evolution provides a very unclear picture. It is 100% innacurate...

  • Who would take so much time to make a parody video that isn't even funny?  Note: some creationists are almost as pathetically stupid as the character that Berean Beacon is playing.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more