Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

What are the differences between H2O and HHO

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
213 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 30, 2010

http://www.hydrowaterpower.com/ http://www.hydrowaterpower.com/hydrogenOrder.htm

You really don't need to wait and spend $18,700 on such a system, in fact, this kind of knowledge has been around for a quite while on theInternet. To obtain such information and do-it-yourself costs less than $100.

Water conversion knowledge is scattered in online discussion forums, online ebooks, and various websites, it is hard to find what's real and what's scam. The most comprehensive and useful manuals are not free. We'll look at various "systems" or "kits" sold on theInternet. We'll also discuss the pros and cons of water-gas technology in the last part of this report.

So which water-gas "conversion kit" is widely used and most popular? Does the "kit" really work? How many folks have used the "kit"? What's their feedback from the REAL users?

You might have already learnt, there are a number of so-called water-gas "conversion kits" floating around. First, you have to realize, the "kits" or "systems" are mostly online guides and manuals (there are a few local installers do sell self-made kits locally).

If you expect to receive a package of "kit" filled with parts with your $50-$100 online order, your expectation is way too high or your understanding is mis-guided. Some guide sounds too good to be true and no public feedback; some manuals are extremely difficult to understand, offer little detailed information.

If you have ever decided to buy such a guide/manual, you should choose the right one, otherwise, you might need to buy others when you find the information is inadequate.

Another important factor to consider is cost. Water-gas online guides cost varies from $50 to $400, depends on which one you follow, the necessary materials to build the kit cost varies from $50 to $500 by doing it yourself.

El Paso, Texas
Malta, Valletta
New Haven, Connecticut
St. Louis, Missouri
Erie, Pennsylvania
Queanbeyan, Australia
Honolulu, Hawaii
Mali, Bamako
Warren, Michigan
As Sur, United Arab Emirates, As Sur, UAE

http://www.hydrowaterpower.com/

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (52)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @MegaVelvetElvis Prized? What's that? Those tests have already been run, and they didn't have to fake their results like the one in the vid I sent to you. Running numbers proves bumblebees can't fly, which, is absoloutly useless to the bumblebee itself.

    No refusal. Give me YOUR airtight circumstances regarding the test. Cover every angle so that there can be no point of contention as to the results and let's see what happens.

  • @ThePresidentialTouch

    "Why, when all you would do with it is something like this."

    Because you'd make millions. There are plenty of prized out there if anyone can demonstrate it works, using an EPA licensed testing facility. I've been running the numbers and power requirements for an HHO device run up short for your average car.

    So you refuse to provide evidence to backup your claim. Okay.

  • @MegaVelvetElvis Why, when all you would do with it is something like this.

    watch?v=ypBhBMOpVFE&feature=re­lated

    Your type are too busy discrediting yourselves, I don't have to do anything.

  • @MegaVelvetElvis Really? Then why would this exist?

    watch?v=ypBhBMOpVFE&feature=re­lated

  • @ThePresidentialTouch

    "you can't prove it didn't!"

    But you "could" take your vehicle to an EPA approved facility and have it tested, with the device on and off. There are plenty of awards available to make it worth your while.

    But you won't do that, because they don't work.

  • @ThePresidentialTouch

    "Since the research has already been done at university level testing standards"

    Liar. I actually read and understood these "university tests". They specifically stated that their emissions were worse. They ran their electrolysis unit off the grid, and the power requirements are beyond a car with a typical alternator.

    Get some math skills sugar britches. The "study" disproves claims that HHO devices work.

  • @Desertphile Shucks, you still haven't produced any evidence. I'm waiting patiently, but it appears you will never get around it producing any. Ah, well. I remain ever cheerful.

  • @ThePresidentialTouch ; Damn, you still haven't produced any evidence. I'm waiting patiently, but it appears you will never get around it producing any. Ah, well. I remain e'er hopeful.

  • @Desertphile Nope! You are incorrect and lying, and they are not the only source for these types of tests performed among others. Some places I have already mentioned.

    You still haven't provided your magical proof. I asked first, and I am disappointed.

    Take a bath.

  • @ThePresidentialTouch ; Yep! You refuse to produce evidence, and then you offered a citation that had nothing at all to do with the subject. LOL! Well, that's the best you can do and I am disappointed.

    Take my challenge.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more