GEET & HHO Update 67 Beetle 4-2-2010

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,030
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 7, 2010

I've tried atomized water, gasoline and oil feeds to the reactor and find that moderate amounts of oil/water mix to yield best fuel mileage with little to no ill effects. Gasoline tends to give the best mileage, but has the problem of excessive engine idle speed which was irritating. GEET reactor is 6 inches and I find that adding an excess amount of oil leads to liquid oil leaving the reactor meaning it was unable to process the volume. This limits my ability to boost mileage beyond a certain point. I've registered 57 MPG highway using gasoline through the reactor, but irritating to drive as idle ran away. Currently the oil water mix runs roughly 60% oil to 40% water and car runs remarkable well. Better than before the reactor was installed using only HHO. Mileage at 70 MPH is right at or slightly higher than 50 MPG which I consider absolutely great. Spark plugs are clean and healthy looking. I've learned a lot and next modification will be a longer reactor and some sort of butterfly system to turn down the GEET system when engine is at idle. I can't run this very aggressively since I can't shut down the GEET while engine is idling.

As I make modifications and improvements I'll post new videos. This has been very labor intensive and I hope to be able to learn enough to get it right the first time on my next vehicle.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (HemilGremil)

  • @HemilGremil man I think I might have talked to you on the phone about this becaue I was wanting to do it to an aircooled vw motor, and you refered me to Paul Pantone, so I went to his website, called him, and payed 250 bucks for some plans... WELL that was back in August, and I finally got the plans... and I think I got ripped off...

  • @eR0ck1nit there were no plans it was a photo of a lawn mower carb, some flanges, and the most scribbled looking partial

     drawing I've ever seen

  • @eR0ck1nit I'm sorry to hear that. Not very professional considering what you paid. I'm going to continue work on the GEET only to get the exhaust-through system to slow down the overly fast flame-point the HHO has. Some recycled exhaust should smooth out the excess use of HHO so we can increase volume of HHO without the need to retard timing too much. Another idea is to use a slight spray of water or moisture into the combustion to take the edge off of the hydrogen. I'll forward this to others.

  • @eR0ck1nit What makes you think you got ripped off? I was considering purchasing those plans or going to one of his training sessions. Let me know more details.

  • you think its difficult because you dont know that you can port to the vacuum with no side effect yet. port your GEET and HHO to the vacuum and use a AFC to control your fuel at all RPMs both accelerating and decelerating. i think when u are ready to do EFI you should port your GEET to the vacuum and port the HHO to the idle intake behind the MAF sensor. everything must be done behind the MAF sensor.

  • @richardlyew Just wanted to point out this is a 1967 vintage auto, no EFI, no MAF, MAP, Oxygen, crankshaft or camshaft sensors present! I have friends experimenting with these on EFI cars and it's more complex believe me. With HHO you must be sure the unit is completely off when throttle is closed. I use a throttle switch that interrupts the ground from the relay. Heavy HHO flow during idle cause a severe lean condition. The CPU will change your fuel ratio and mileage will drop for sure.

see all

All Comments (37)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @HemilGremil I think you would have to see the picture to understand... it looks like he told a 5 year old to respond to my email with a crayon. He's not answering my phone calls now. I'm just a poor college student I didn't really have that kind of money to be tossing around.

  • Well, great work. I admire your work. Well done.

  • @maZZiveAttack Yes, those are plastic zip ties. It doesn't get hot enough at that point to melt plastic. My thinking is to get the gases inside the tube as cool as possible so it's more dense once it goes into the intake. Since I allow the gases to enter at the carburetor I was worried about excess heat and vapor lock. It did not vapor lock, so I was OK. Hardly makes sense to try for extreme mileage and then have trouble restarting the engine hot. This car starts fine and drives great.

  • Zip-ties to the heat-sink???

  • very well done system. great job. continue your work please. and keep us informed

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more