William Dembski: How To Be An Intellectually Fulfilled Atheist (or not) Part 2
Top Comments
All Comments (119)
-
@StLukey7 Everyone is born an atheist.
-
@mexico3210 No comprendo, Senor.
What do you mean, evolution hasn't yet accounted for "anything"?
-
Thanks for summing things up. I guess.
If it "hasn't yet accounted" for anything and "everyone in biology is an evolutionist," do you think it's reasonable to say "just do some more research"?
-
I can report a video for being hateful to religion, why can't I report it for being hateful to scientific truth?
-
there really is no such thing as an atheist. no one is that stupid!
-
I find this problematic and telling. The fact that scientists can say "We don't know, but we have ideas" he finds unsatisfactory. He had a good grasp on evolutionary theory, but has no idea how science works. Science doesn't know everything, and in that he claims it is a failure. That saddens me and shows that he is educated enough to jump to conclusions without knowing what he's going on about or he's purposely misrepresenting things.
-
I can't believe in 2009 he's still dragging around the bacterial flagellum and mousetrap examples. These were debunked by Dr. Kenneth Miller in the 2005 Dover, PA court case.
I can't watch this any more, as I really like living in the 21st century.
-
evo imaginations: "it convinces them in the privacy of their minds" lol
-
the IQ of the guy below sits at @ 60 now.
@onlinesid I'm looking forward this scientific findings, could you name a few of them?
nonseans 1 year ago 3
Dembski's argument, summed up: Evolution hasn't yet accounted for every single biochemical pathway, so we have to immediately throw up our hands and say God did it.
Or we could just do some more research...
NevilleRhysBarnes 3 months ago 2