William Dembski: How To Be An Intellectually Fulfilled Atheist (or not) Part 2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,990
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 27, 2009

One of the foremost authorities on Intelligent Design, Dr. William Dembski delivers a lecture at the 2008 National Conference on Christian Apologetics in Charlotte, NC.

To view titles by Dr. William Dembski go to:

http://theapologeticsbookstore.com/search.aspx?find=William+Dembski&log=f...

  • likes, 20 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @onlinesid I'm looking forward this scientific findings, could you name a few of them?

  • Dembski's argument, summed up: Evolution hasn't yet accounted for every single biochemical pathway, so we have to immediately throw up our hands and say God did it.

    Or we could just do some more research...

see all

All Comments (119)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @StLukey7 Everyone is born an atheist.

  • @mexico3210 No comprendo, Senor.

    What do you mean, evolution hasn't yet accounted for "anything"?

  • @NevilleRhysBarnes

    Thanks for summing things up. I guess.

    If it "hasn't yet accounted" for anything and "everyone in biology is an evolutionist," do you think it's reasonable to say "just do some more research"?

  • I can report a video for being hateful to religion, why can't I report it for being hateful to scientific truth?

  • there really is no such thing as an atheist. no one is that stupid!

  • I find this problematic and telling. The fact that scientists can say "We don't know, but we have ideas" he finds unsatisfactory. He had a good grasp on evolutionary theory, but has no idea how science works. Science doesn't know everything, and in that he claims it is a failure. That saddens me and shows that he is educated enough to jump to conclusions without knowing what he's going on about or he's purposely misrepresenting things.

  • I can't believe in 2009 he's still dragging around the bacterial flagellum and mousetrap examples. These were debunked by Dr. Kenneth Miller in the 2005 Dover, PA court case.

    I can't watch this any more, as I really like living in the 21st century.

  • evo imaginations: "it convinces them in the privacy of their minds" lol

  • the IQ of the guy below sits at @ 60 now.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more