Perpetual Motion - analyzing the Finsrud GMD (IPMM 6).

The Finsrud Gravito Magnetic Device (GMD) analyzed:
This is Reidar Finsrud from Norway. He was born 5 march 1946. He is a painter and a sculptor. One day he wanted to make an ashtray... floating on a magnetic field. It didn't work, he got angry and said: 'Not stable? Then I'll make it move!. that was in 1984. he thought and tried for many years. He studied the magnetic restlessness and what the best arrangement would be. He discovered that adding a normal pendulum, to the chaos pendulum, prolonged its activity. He used three pendulums to control it and made a track, He attached it to the chaos pendulum. Horseshoe magnets fixed to the pendulums were to control the movements of the setup, with on it a steel ball of 0.82 kg, 2,7''. The ball Passed a lever to drive the pendulums, but the unrest ended after a while, the ball stopped on the track. So he placed the setup on a column and created a vibrating connection. It took him many years to figure out the design of the vibratory unit between the ball and the top. This is the final building plan. In 1996 the ball finally kept moving! This newspaper picture was shot when the machine ran for 6 weeks. And so is it running ever since, with some maintenance now and then. Maintenance: 1) cleaning the track. 2) Redo the resin fix of the magnet array in the base.
It is the first working perpetuum mobile in human history! Now, how must we explain this?

The device suggests this:

If we repel or expand from a diallel - towards the center - array of magnets and counter that force with the contraction or attraction of gravity driven magnets, then we can make a motor run given a cyclic setup containing a vibrating feedback loop.

In the video the technical and theoretical analysis.

See also:
- Aadhar's drawing of the Finsrud device discussed in this video: http://theorderoftime.com/science/free_energy/support-files/finsrud.html
- A YouTube video about Finsrud in the news: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBQSl3GexPM
- Finsrud's site: http://www.galleri-finsrud.no/sider/mobile/mobile.html
- Aadhar's free energy research pages: http://theorderoftime.com/science/free_energy/index.html
- The article of John Pasley describing a visit to Finsruds gallery on 17 March 2001: - http://theorderoftime.com/science/free_energy/support-files/finsrud.html#visit
- A video of a visit to the gallery with 45 minutes on continuous work : http://video.google.nl/videoplay?docid=553061720631716456
- Overunity.com discussion pages about the perpetual motion machine of Finsrud http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=18.0
- Peswiki infopage about Finsrud's device: http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Finsrud%27s_Perpetuum_Mobile
- IPMM-pages at Overunity.com: http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4449.new.html
- See Finsrud talking: in the videoseries: The Quest for Free Energy 1-6 http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=SwKlIgoaLlQ

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• perpetuum mobile
• perpetual motion
• overunity
• magnet motor
• gravity engine
• Finsrud
• space energy
• space foam
• free energy
• Anand Aadhar
• pradhana
• quantum physics
• analysis

[cjsveningsson]

You, my sir, have absolutely no clue about how scientific discovery works

[anandaadhar]

@cjsveningsson This concerns an artistic kinetic art discovery which implies that a machine can self-operate for 14 days on a level we have difficulty with to explain scientifically. I never said this is a scientific discovery. Scientifically the Finsrud machine is just a hint, not more. The real science of testing hypothesis and theories indeed is something completely different, Finsrud has no clue about nor does he pretend to. To him the PM thing was just a hobby.

[BrandonFound]

pendulum. Its a GD pendulum. I can tie a string to a boot, hang it from the ceiling, set it in motion and achieve similar results because the Earth is spinning at 1000 MPH. Neither my boot nor this device can generate a single volt of electricity. If it freed just one extra electron for energy, thousands of years of physics go out the window.

[BrandonFound]

@fireforthought Why do people like to dissect ideas? Thats the entire nature of science which we would NEED if this were to ever be something to "change the future." Unfortunately, this device doesn't hold up to scrutiny, its a glorified pendulum and pendulums don't generate power. Even if this were perpetual motion, your missing the point of perpetual motion which is 100% energy efficiency. The moment you try and take power (generate electricity) it would dip below 100 and slow down.

[shubus]

The Universe probably won't let more than one of these devices exist.

[fireforthought]

Why do people love to dissect an idea that may possibly change the future to better ourselves but instead to regress into destruction dictated by the greed that motivates our demisze!! Take your heads out of your asses for once....

[theblahman]

@kurisu925 Thats exactly what i thought, slowing down the release of energy is not perpetual motion, its essentially the same idea as winding a clock

[kurisu925]

@anandaadhar And yes it is easy to say something is a fraud when you can so easily look up a man's criminal history these days. A simple back ground check on the people pushing the scam will usually be far more than any reasonable person needs to see them for what they are. Maybe you ought to give it a try. By the way... this particular machine only ran for a maximum of about 14 days before it needed to be restarted. It is desinged only to hold on to it's initial energy as long as possible.

[kurisu925]

@anandaadhar I have searched everywhere man. I have never once found even a single instance of anyone working on a "free energy" (Proper term "Overunity") machine that did not later turn out to be a fraud. Some end up in prison for pretending to sell machines that they never even send, others sell plans with out actually promising that the machine functions to take advantage of loop holes in the law, and otheres simply claim that they need more funding for research they never intend to do.

[anandaadhar]

@frithwks Occam's razor concerns the principle of not going beyond necessity, then you have to wonder why he gave all the trouble to built such a complicated machine, something like George Delk's would have been a much simpler kinetic artwork thing. He is an idealist type who really wants to make a difference. No, I am sure he at least gave it a serious try and has presented the results. Maybe he hides a drive, but it is still a hell of a job to present such a delicate balance of forces.....