Dna Molecular Biology Visualizations - Wrapping And Replicat

Dna Molecular Biology Visualizations - Wrapping And Replication.mpg

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• dna
• molecular
• biology
• wrapping
• replication

[Zeabos]

@practicetestaccount Macro evolution is powered by natural selection. Genetic Drift is a general trend in a subset of individuals towards one particular phenotype/genotype over time for a series of reasons irrelevant to your point. It is impossible to reduce genetic information in phenotypes, in fact, what do you even mean by 'reduce gen. info.' In short, your post makes no sense. It seems you have little grasp of genetics, and are attempting to impress people with improperly used jargon.

[practicetestaccount]

@StefanandNathan You may need to facepalm harder if you think natural selection = macro evolution. 5000+ years of selective breeding applied this principle & proves to REDUCE genetic information in phenotypes. Ever heard of genetic drifting? same thing. Gregory Mendel vigorously opposed Darwinian evolution & his explanation for inheritance (ignorantly called "blending") & wrote Darwin of his discovery of genes, which Darwin rejected as being too mathematical. Evolution is a political weapon.

[phuturephunk]

Seriously, this video was great, are there any more like it out there with the same quality of animation?

Billions of Tiny factories in me working constantly! Amazing!

[phuturephunk]

This is so epic..

Puff...

[practicetestaccount]

@Zeabos "Macro evolution is powered by natural selection"

No, mutation is imagined as this driving force. NS only 'selects' which subset survives (a REDUCTION process). Congrats, you don't even understand your own fake religion & must deny the plain facts of empirical science to uphold it. That a relatively tiny number of species exist now then in the past proves my point. Unfortunately no amount of real science & logic will kill macro-evo as it was never founded on such to begin with.

[FriScho]

@mokopa

A Combustion Engine is very primitiv compared to that because it did not evolve it was thought. But the modern combustion engines are much more complex because of evolution in design. You keep the stuff that works good and add new stuff. Even man-made-stuff gets better that way. This incredible complex thing called "organism" is the result of millions of years of this process. It's not "BAM there it is - I did it with magic btw" from some "god". BTW: Who created god?

[conartist1991]

@mokopa Fine, what are your thoughts on Complex Systems, and in particular, self organisation?

[mokopa]

@conartist1991

I'm not a PhD yet, if that's what you're asking, but I can confidentally assert that my knowledge of particle physics places me at the far end of the skinny part of the bell curve.

[conartist1991]

@mokopa Does your "knowledge" of particle physics include any formal training?o Or does " particle physics is a bit of a forte for me" mean " I watched youtube Videos on the LHC?"

[mokopa]

@FriScho

There's not much to think about. The laws of nature, described by science, are as complex as they need to be to bring about all the wonderful processes necessary to maintain this complex universe. You're asking a silly question anyway - look at how complex an internal combustion engine needs to be just to make the wheels on the bus go round and round. Think about THAT.

[mokopa]

@conartist1991

I don't know you, nor your background, but if you'd like to issue a challenge to compare our respective "knowledge and understanding of physics", I'd be more than happy. I actually know a lot, and particle physics is a bit of a forte for me. So, chum, bring it on...