Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Re: Debunking yet another silly conspiracy theory

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
4,457
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 2, 2007

What happens when evidence contradicts your claim? For scientists, that's an easy question: you reexamine your claim!

  • likes, 38 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (totovader)

  • dude your a douche. DOn't you know who Nikola Tesla is?!? you wouldn't even live the way you live without the inventor of AC and radio. What about flipped over cars at wtc similar to the renowned experimentor John J. Hutchinson. His so called Hutchison effect leaves all possibilities open. You are the type of brother gonna keep us down. close minded douche

  • You're babbling- you don't even know what you're talking about. The "Hutchison Effect" was debunked- and John Hutchison admitted to faking videos which he claimed showed his research.

    Flipped over cars? Did you watch the video, here? The flipped over cars come from an unusual scientific phenomena known as a "clean up using a forklift". Moron.

  • lol that makes 2 of us tool

  • Let's see who's the tool- see if you can stop babbling for 5 minutes and answer my Challenge. If you don't like the DRFOS claims (despite the fact that its a popular claim among "the Scholars") then perhaps you can show everyone what the RIGHT claim is- see my Challenge video and stop wasting both our time.

  • wait ..what what the fuck....deathray.......what a waste of time

    its still an inside job...

    and toto ur wasting ur time wtf? are you doing

  • Why am I wasting MY time? YOU are the one posting on a video OVER A YEAR OLD...

Top Comments

  • radicislam;bsregistration;jay1­23jd like to just spam insults but cannot debate science. i tire of this/them.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Debunking yet another silly conspiracy theory
see all

All Comments (252)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Two of NIST's contractors for 9/11 report (ARA & SAIC) are involved in developing DEW (Directed Energy Weapons).

    ARA are co founders of 'Directed Energy Prof Soc'

    Rumsfeld when questioned by a reporter (it's on youtube) admitted DEWs are in "early stages" (how advanced does that make classified DEW?!).

    Basic DEWs now appear on warships and are openly used for crowd control (ADS).

    But all of the above is just an elaborate conspiracy to make us believe DEWs exist.

    - they don't!

    Honest! ;)

  • You cannot disprove a 4 day time cube!

  • he's gotta be dis-info agent...or really stupid

  • The funniest thing about totovader is his avatar haha :D As he himself states, lack of evidence is not evidence xD guess he got evidence there is no Death Ray :P And no i dont believe there is a death ray, but i dont mind people believing it :)

  • AD Hominem's do not construct an arguement.

  • Really? Well I have a construction worker in the family that has been using thermite for a number of years and states that the timing can be accurate, the way it can be controlled is very precise and can be even remotely detonated. So who is lying here? Some faceless youtube user with no facts to back up his claim, or a member of my own family who has a JOB in the field.

  • These are the real that should be thrown out like "Death Ray from outter space!"

    Give me a fucking break, someone like me who is intuitively knowledgeable about technology knows that the idea and technology is well beyond our capabilities at least for the next 40-80 years.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more