Has history been tampered with? When and Why Homer counts "Iliad" about which Troy?

Has history been tampered with? Homer's "Iliad" tells the tale of the First Crusade. When we think of Homer's Troy, we imagine it in fantasy hues of times long gone. And yet the latest research conducted of one of the world's leading mathematicians proves it to us irrefutably: what we know as the "Trojan War" was in fact the First Crusade!
CLICK ON AMAZON.COM LINK!
We aren't talking about obvious parallels between two major military campaigns separated by millennia - the Trojan War and the First Crusade are but different names of one and the same military campaign. The former ended up in the distant past due to the blatantly erroneous chronology that we use - one that was created by the Jesuits in the 16th 17th century. This chronology, regarded by many as the absolute historical truth, contains many gaps and repetitions. Most major historical events (as well as personalities and even places) have several phantom duplicates arbitrarily dated to various antediluvian epochs and presumed completely unrelated to one another - the Trojan War and the First Crusade are a perfect example. Our entire view of the so-called "Antiquity" and the Middle Ages changes radically; history becomes streamlined and unencumbered by all the dark ages, lost empires and mystical cyclic patterns that afflict the official version. The duplicates all roll into a single historical reality - Classical Greek poleis become one with the mediaeval Crusader states, ancient Egyptian paganism identifies as Coptic Christianity, and historical Troy, Constantinople and Jerusalem turn out to be the same city on the Bosporus, which we know as Istanbul. The city in Palestine known as Jerusalem today remained a nondescript Arabic settlement called El-Kuds until the 18th century. There isn't a single Crusader map in existence that would locate Jerusalem in Palestine (or indeed give us any detailed information about that region) - unlike modern historians, mediaeval cartographers knew the location of the Holy Land perfectly well.

Sounds absurd? Not if you have read "History: Fiction or Science?" by Professor Anatoly Fomenko - a brilliant mathematician and a true scientist to the core - unconfined by dogmatic thinking and determined to get to the bare historical truth at any cost.

Biblical nations of Gog and Magog were Goths alias Slavs.

How much do we know about the Goths? Those fortunate enough to keep at a sound distance from the historical discourse shall probably think of those numerous Bela Lugosi impersonators who live by their hairspray and their macabre aesthetics. Those who did devote some of their time to tearing through all the insurmountable dogma and inexplicable lacunae in place of vibrant ages and civilizations that one finds in history textbooks will doubtlessly think of Jordanes and Cassiodorus in this respect, and recollect the Goths to have been a group of Germanic tribes who swarmed Europe in the alleged 3rd century AD -- and "alleged" is a key word here -- to rape, pillage and terrorize. But how Germanic were they really, and when exactly have they been introduced to us as such?

According to Anatoly Fomenko, one of the world's leading mathematicians, the Goths were Slavic through and through. This alone would fail to make a piece of sensational news -- however, Fomenko redefines sensational telling us that the Gothic tribes were none other but the Biblical nations of Gog and Magog! That might sound like nonsense -- after all, don't the Old Testament events date back to times immemorial?

"History: Fiction or Science?" is a phenomenal and unprecedented scientific experiment since neither state-of-the-art methods of mathematical statistics nor astronomical data have ever been applied to history before. One would expect such a procedure to yield interesting results -- but "interesting" doesn't remotely approach the results of Fomenko's research. Ancient and mediaeval history transform into a phantom, leaving us with a historical period of a single millennium to encompass everything from Jesus Christ (who is proved to have lived in the 11th century AD) to our time. Definitely nonsense and positively impossible, you say? Just wait till you get infected with the New Chronology meme, and mark our words -- looking back at your vehement support of consensual history will be most embarrassing indeed!

Category:

Travel & Events

Tags:

• greek
• roman
• science
• tartars
• ancient
• logic
• museum
• fact
• victory
• timeline
• rome
• greece
• egypt
• russia
• troy
• ship
• king
• helene
• painting
• paint
• castle
• palace
• river
• babylon
• human
• geography
• clock
• time
• measure
• astrology
• gods
• english
• apocalypse
• apostle
• egyptian
• manuscript
• book
• monument
• art
• writing
• house
• building
• forum
• latin
• sham
• catholic
• protestant
• service
• religion
• pope
• cult
• genghis
• khan

[NajonThePeaceMaker]

This is fascinating. I think I should learn more about this. Not that I believe this, I've read what Fomeko's colleages have to say about his work...

How old does Fomenko think the earth is, I wonder.

[mithec]

4 500 000 000 000 years +/-200 000 000 years

[mithec]

covered his nightpot with?

[beggo321]

this is bullshit, because it is proven that alexander the great was from about 350BC and he always kept a copy of 'the iliad' under his bed.

[mithec]

first google>books>fomenko then comment

[mithec]

..Critics of the New Chronology often mention that biographies of certain rulers, like Napoleon and Hitler (both dictators) are quite similar, so by applying the method of Morozov and Fomenko we should consider them to be the same person and ultimately make a senseless statement that the first 20 years of the 19th century are simply the years thirties and forties of the 20th century.

[Seleucus84]

Meth it's a helluva drug...

[carsalcyril]

try to put your logic on some order first.

[sdarbro]

Maybe the Caucaus Mountain was really Nordstroms department store? Thus, the Voynich Manuscript could, in all actuality, be "Ramona The Pest". Also, watch for MY video which will be out in 2012 which definitively proves that the Holy Grail really IS the Stanley Cup.

[fourganger88]

Fomenko is so full of crap it's unbelievable. I can use his method to "proove" that Napoleon and Hitler were the same person. How can his method therefore be accurate? Please reply, I'd like to see how you defend against this statement.