Creation vs. Evolution: The Giraffe's Wonder Net
Uploader Comments (SteveJS113)
All Comments (41)
-
I don't see how the fact that a giraffe has a circulatory system that works is evidence of a creator. Many animals have structures much different than our own in order to help them maintain balance and blood pressure. Why is this one in particular evidence of design?
-
Hey steve can you please recommend me some books, cheers.
-
The point this video is making is that the circulatory system of the giraffe was designed. And a design implies a Designer. Evolutionists, however, have a different worldview in which no Designer is possible. Thus, they look at the giraffe's circulatory system and state that it was not designed even though it appears to be designed. It's a matter of taking the same evidence and interpreting it in different ways depending on one's worldview.
-
well, this isnt giving it one way or the other. We both agree that giraffes exist. noone is saying otherwise, on either side......
-
Because there are two ways of looking at this. Evolutionists say the giraffe's complex circulatory system is a product of time and blind chance. Creationists (and Intelligent Design proponents) say that the giraffe's circulatory system was designed. IDers don't identify the designer. Creationists identify the designer as God.
-
that was wonderful. i like learning about animals. but why does the title say evolution vs creationism?
If there IS some consistent evidence FOR creationism, I would welcome it with open arms. Why does dna show a clear link between animals with a common ancestor? Why do psuedogenes exist? How is it that we can witness evolution in our lifetime with bacteria? Explain to me why a giraffes laryngeal nerve makes such a drastic detour from the brain, this all sounds too farcical and to say that its in your book, isn't evidence, I await your reply before writing the notion off with santa and fairies.
Shifteightyfiveokay 2 years ago 2
You would not welcome it with open arms because there is plenty of evidence for creationism and a designer. I'm not going to answer all your objections because there are many good books out there. I suggest you read a book not written by an evolutionist for a change. And by the way, DNA does not provide evidence for evolution. There are many species that are morphologically very similar but have DNA that is very dissimilar. If anyone believes in fairies and fairy tales, it's evolutionists.
SteveJS113 2 years ago
@SteveJS113 yeh we no the changes that make these animals diffrent ever heard of genetics
patrickledford420 2 years ago
Of course I've heard of genetics! And did you know that genetics gives support to biblical creation and demonstrates the impossibility of neo-Darwinian evolution? Genetics sets limits on the changes that take place, so one kind of animal does NOT give rise to different kinds of animals. You can have small dogs and big dogs but never do you see a pair of dogs produce a cat or something else. The science of genetics was founded by Gregor Mendel, a Bible-believer who did not accept Darwinism.
SteveJS113 2 years ago