Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

SAWSTOP in TimeWarp

Небольшой эпизод из шоу TimeWarp с демонстрацией системы SAWSTOP  
 
Customize

More From: Stasnet

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
551 ratings
Sign in to rate
320,245 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (227)   Options

Loading...
casaroli (10 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
remember, people swet when working; swet has salt, that makes an even better conductor
 0
Marked as spam
what if its not wet?
Utilizzarre (2 days ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Lol it's not really fair test if he is dipping his finger in cold water before hand.
jasonbiddulph (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
well done my dad almost lost his whole arm on a table saw but 300 stiches and 4 hours of surgery saved his arm that is 100% as it was before could have been his arm or his life he lost.

a great invention !!
KingNast (6 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
SawStop will even replace the mechanism for free if you send it back to them and they determine that it was triggered by a body part. I guess it has some way of recording the signal that triggered it
jasonbiddulph (3 days ago)
Comment removed by author
KingNast (6 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
so the blade will just cut through the callous until it hits flesh... the idea is to prevent amputation, not a small cut. I'm sure if you hit the blade fast enough you'd get a pretty nasty cut, but it's better than losing a finger
mustiej70 (1 week ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Humans made machines.
Humans can make mistakes.
So does machines.
Don't trust it to much.
MrGame20 (6 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
but the mistakes made by humans represented on machine are very different than human mistakes. Since the mistake of 'humans' is that we never do the same thing twice the same way. (why double check work if you did?) the mistake on machines is thus algorithmic and is likely less of a concern. That said having it doesn't seem like it would be too costly as a fail safe.
swaryne (3 days ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
@mustiej70 Even still, when you are dealing between a whole finger and one cut in half, you'd rather have a single act fail safe than no fail safe at all.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.