Can Atilla - Sultanlar Aşkina

Exelent music & video that describes the fall of Constantinople and the Byzantine Empire, May 29-th 1453

Lyrics in Turkish:

Sultanlar aşkına

bir masal gibi başlar hikaye
çağlar eskimiş KONSTANTINOPOL'DE
bitmiş aşkların sessiz şehrinde
bir kandil yanar sönmez gecelerce

hayaller kurar yalnız odasında
kalbine sorar kimsin bu cihanda
sonsuzu arar masmavi sularda
gökte yıldızlar parlar bu uğurda

sultanlar aşkına dilfigâr yıllar
surların şarkısı suskun dalgalar
bekliyor yine aşklar küsmüş rüyalar
rüzgarın ruhuna teslim hisarlar

bir inançtı bu kudret kitabından
bir görev bilir kalmış atalardan
ay doğar yine parlar üzerinde
solsa da zaman KONSTANTINOPOL'DE

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Can
• Atilla
• Sultanlar
• Askina
• Constantinople
• Istanbul
• Byzantium
• Byzantine
• Empire
• Turkey
• Orthodoxy
• Islam
• May
• 29-th
• 1453
• Constantine
• XI
• Palaeologos
• Fatih
• Mehmed
• II
• The
• Conqueror

[trapper24]

Fatih Sultan Mehmet and Mustafa Kemal Atatürk always are commander to İstanbul

[ramco07]

istanbul is the most beautiful city of the world.the city of love.

[Doomshark3]

@34enes u said saracid! Saracen was a word used by crusaders generally meaning muslims. I said that hadith is fabricated, meaning it isn't authentic. Ansari didn't conquer istanbul! R u making your own history? Istanbul (Constantinople) was conquered in 1453, ansari was long dead by then. The Quran is more authentic than ansari & bukhari. Its an insult to those who follow blindly & do not use their brains, as for munafiq, u clearly dont know arabic or what that word means.

[Doomshark3]

@34enes ..Saracid is not saracen! Saracen was a word used by crusaders meaning muslims. Saracens did not have a dynasty! I said that hadith is fabricated, meaning it isn't authentic. Ansari didn't conquer istanbul. history then? Istanbul( constantinople) was conquered in 1453, ansari was long dead by then! The Quran is more authentic than ansari & bukhari. Insult only to those who follow blindly & do not use their brains, as for munafiq, u clearly dont know arabic or what that word means.

[34enes]

i wished i had lived in that time and fought with them together next to fatih sultan mehmed next to ulubatli hasan, oh my god what a wonderful feeling what an honor.

it would be a pleasure to drop blood on that way...

[34enes]

@Doomshark3

saracen i mean, don't u know saracen?

in ottoman empire, people were of course aible to speak arabic.

and oh my god u said that hadith didn't exist. are munafiq or something? do u know eyyub al-ansari? he was sahabi and fought with our prophet together. and after that hadith about istanbul he went there to conquer it but fall. today every muslim is visiting that sahabas grave in istanbul. u even insult a sahaba by saying that hadith doesn't exist...

[Doomshark3]

@34enes you didn't answer this, what is Saracid u mentioned? theres no such name. Abassid Dynasty ended with fall of baghdad in the 13th century, & ottomans didn't invade Cairo till early 15th century, & ottomans are mostly a mixture of Tartars & persians, & they never took over all the arab countries, & they couldn't speak arabic well..so how did they lead 1000 years, unless you have a wild imagination!

[Doomshark3]

@34enes , name calling shows your manners & upbringing. Turks did not lead anything for 1000 yrs, let alone Islam. You clearly do not know who turks or ottomans are. That hadith is fabricated & wasnt said by the prophet, & it refered to arabs, & anyway, still doesn't say anything about turks!! if you are muslim, which i doubt it, try to remember what the quran says about manners of discussion. History does not say anything about turks leading islam, cos islam isnt lead by anyone!

[34enes]

@Doomshark3

r u stupid or something? what did they do? oh they just leaded islam for 1000 years, and spreaded and fought in the name of allah. thats all. i don't care what ancient arabs said. what i do know is the hadith:

لتفتحن القسطنطنيه فلنعم الأمير أميرها ولنعم الجيش ذلك الجيش

and that belongs to turks الحمد لله

of course turks used arabic language. for every turkish muslim is arabic a more important language than turkish. they prefered always arabic to the turkish...

[Doomshark3]

who is saracid exactly?? & the only true caliphates are the 4 ones. Umayyads & abassids were kings & not caliphas. But tell me, what service exactly did the Turks give to Islam? any famous jurist schools? nope, the 4 were arab. Any scientists? nope. Do you see arabs using turkish words or turks using arabic words?! you look at history from a twisted angle resulting in false understandings. do you know what ancient arabs said about turks in their books?

[Doomshark3]

@34enes .first of all, i know about that history more than you know. second, Turks were brought in by arabs not for their religiosity, but for their fighting skills, they called them Mameluks (owned. thirdly, You cannot lead religion! thats absurd. Ottomans were secular sultans & not caliphas. You talk from a nationalistic sentiment,.As for those items in the topkapi, they do not belong to the prophet or his companions, nothing of his stuff survived. You do not know history!

[34enes]

@Flaeren

ah u don't need religion? why don't u bang your mum? why don't u let your mum banging with various men? why not introduce this? why don't u bang your daughter? the pedophile is an invetion by human anyway. just be free, u have nothing to be afraid of. stupid moron get outta turkey asshole. turkey was founded only for islam u idiot. istanbul was conquered only because of islam. whats your business here? get back to middle asia. this country was founded by dropping muslim blood...