NOVA - Intelligent Design on Trial pt 2

2nd part to NOVA documentary

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• evolution
• intelligent
• design
• religion
• Dover
• Christianity
• yt:stretch=16:9

[DeathBringer9000]

so it turned from teaching evolution being illegal to teaching ID or creationism being illegal. why cant both be (il)legal?

[svaught32]

Well, let's see. Evolution is Science so it belongs in a Science class. ID or Creationism is not Science so it has no place in a Science class. Maybe in a Theology class.

[DeathBringer9000]

ok, so why is evolution/random spawning science and ID/creationism not? can they prove that the first organism randomly appeared?

[svaught32]

ID/Creationism is not Science. We can't observe or test a designer or god. Just like Football is not baseball. First organism appearing is Abiogenesis, not Evolution.

[ProcInc]

A biology book laced with Darwinism!

What next? A chemistry book laced with the periodic table with no alternative like alchemy to balance it?

[BoyintheMachine]

LOL...like putting Astrology books next to the Astronomy books.

[sonykroket]

@Wolfje777

Please don't tell me you're dutch? Either way, you're an embarrassment to mankind with your superstitious crap

The holy spirit receives facial cumshots for 50 bucks a pop to support it's meth habit.

[Wolfje777]

i believe Christ delivered the disciples of religion and bible.

He taught them to trust upon their intuition and on the Holy Spirit: Love.

[Wolfje777]

@DeathBringer9000 creationism is a lie.it pretends to be science, but it isnt. Science has done lots of discoveries and one of them is: the world is 4,7 bllion years old. this isnt proven by carbon dating method: but with 14 other methods who go further back in time: bible teaches: do everything in this book and u will be blessed. do some things not and u will be cursed. but read also Deuteronomy 27:26 Cursed EVERYONE who does not Uphold EVERYTHING written in this book U cant uphold bible

[Wolfje777]

@DeathBringer9000

why?

because evolution is based upon DNA-proof.

Creationism is based upon a book disproven by tests u can repeat in a laboratory and DNA codes who testify that all apes and humans have a common ancestor.

also U can see that the assumption "the bible is true", based upon a book is not very strong...

telling the Bible is true is misleading yourselves.

But God is greater than books: read the bhagavad gita.

it will clear up a lot of mess caused by false assumptions.

[ez910503]

@DeathBringer9000 evolution cannot be paired with "random spawning". Evolution is the slow process of natural selection of existing organisms based on minute allelic variations in the genome. Evolution is elegant and scientists would be glad to throw it out if it could be disproved...but despite centuries of scientific inquiry, that has yet to happen. ID is closer to random spawning, the appearance of creatures unrelated to their environment. Are museums filled with designer's mistakes?

[ASexyChef]

Creationist, are confused by science so instead of trying to figure it out, they want a more simplistic answer. And so to not feel dumb, because evolution is too confusing, it can't be true. Sheesh the religious nut jobs are no different today as when they burned people at the stake, the only difference is they are not in power or they would drag the rest of us back to the dark ages.

[Free4801]

wow children should be taught all aspects of science....intelligent design is just a way of keeping us dumb down and not to ask questions. the dude believes really believes the earth is 4,000yrs old i mean how dumb do you get?

[1stAres]

keeping in mind that i myself am an American, it was actually a Double Cheeseburger with Fries and a chocolate shake.

[lewisner]

Is it true that all Americans are evolved from a Double Cheeseburger with Fries?

[somberlight]

lets see, 1) IDiotism doesn't follow THE scientific method, but tries to refedine the terms so that their "research" might sound better 2) IDiotism has nothing peer reviewed 3) IDiotism do not research anything, they only oppose. can you name a properly reviewed single research made by IDiots? let me ask YOU instead, can you prove an instant but complete creation of anything ?