Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary

Return to Halo with Chris Watters in this review for Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary.

Category:

• Gaming

Tags:

• cbsepisode
• Halo
• Combat
• Evolved
• Anniversary
• gameplay
• official
• exclusive
• HD
• review
• Master
• Chief
• xbox
• microsoft
• game
• studios
• 343
• industries
• cortana

[MrPudude]

men, here is where we show those split chin squid head sons of bitches that they could not evict the worst the worst enemies in the human race, we are going to blow the hell out of those scum balls until we have nothing left to shoot them with, and then we are going to strangle them with their own living guts, AM I RIGHT MARINES!!!!

[iamRevan117]

@MrPudude SIR, YES SIR!!!

[HatoburekaSutajio]

@ThePandemic101

I've completed Halo CE, Halo 2, Halo 3, and Halo: Reach on Legendary and have played them all extensively online.

Despite it's improved mechanics and multiplayer, Reach's campaign disappointed me. Other than it's gamebreaking bugs, it was very mild compared to Halo 2, however it was still entertaining to a degree just as can be said for even some of the worst games.

Now let me ask you: WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?

Where'd you come up with that shit?

[ThePandemic101]

@HatoburekaSutajio Reach's campaign is boring, wtf are you talking about? Obviously you're not a true Halo fan.

[warrenvazquez]

looking at some of the updated environments i feel as though some of the atmosphere of the original is lost. some areas have just been filled up where they were once sparse. a little restraint in some areas would have helped.

[RandomAnonymousBeing]

@HatoburekaSutajio You know what? your right, this conversation is going around in circles, so lets end it. (stop replying to me)

[HatoburekaSutajio]

@RandomAnonymousBeing

It's a remaster, not a remake.

You're pulling a strawman argument by falsely insinuating that I meant I don't like the game.

And for the umpteenth time, you're not telling anyone what they don't already know. Whereas I've repeated the idea of "legacy is irrelevant to quality" multiple times with differing degrees of clarity and it still hasn't penetrated you thick skull.

Your words are fallacious all the way around, and therefore corrupt.

Block.

[RandomAnonymousBeing]

@HatoburekaSutajio thats why the game is a REMAKE. jesus, if you dont like halo CE anniversary then fine, dont buy it. but remember, if not for that first telephone,then there wouldnt be any smart phones. so if there wasnt Halo CE, then there would be no Halo Reach.

[HatoburekaSutajio]

@RandomAnonymousBeing

Alexander Bell's first working telephone was the SHIT, 140 years ago.

What kind of reception do you think that hunk of crap would draw today?

[HatoburekaSutajio]

@RandomAnonymousBeing

When grading on a 10-point scale, critics will rarely be able to approximate how much better a game can be 10 years from now.

Back then, Halo was THE shooter, so naturally it got a high score out of 10. Today it's around par with what we usually get, so it's lower. I've suggested this already.

I'm chill, but there's a perfectly legit reason to be frustrated with stubborn asses who can't understand fundamental concepts.

[RandomAnonymousBeing]

@HatoburekaSutajio K, first of all you need ta chill. second of all, I agree, in my opinion reach is beter. however IGN gave the original Halo CE a 9.6 out of 10. they gave this a lower score. it is exactly the same as the first except it has extra stuff. not saying this game deserves a score that high, but some IGNs reasons were dumb. and please dont reply to me, im tired of arguing with u

[HatoburekaSutajio]

@RandomAnonymousBeing

"but had they made it play like reach, then it wouldnt feel like the first halo game,"

SOOO WHAAAAT!? Everyone knows this! It's true! Why bring it up?! It's ENTIRELY IRRELEVANT!

No one's suggesting that it SHOULD be like Reach you dumb shit, they were just comparing the experience to Reach! Like any good judge damn well should!

Reach's campaign has a lot of great things this one doesn't, so logically it will SCORE LOWER.

GET IT YET?