Part 1/3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7r7ZAQ5NRS4
Part 2/3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OcVKMWB-Vg
Lapse of Sfetkopoulos stay means lapse of Krieger stay!! Crown Attorney David Frankel argued the Krieger invalidation never took effect because the stay pending further order continued after the Final Order dismissing their appeal and still needed to be lifted when, once an appeal is dismissed and the court becomes functus officio, no further motions may be made at all. So Frankel's Foible results in the Krieger invalidation being stayed forever and now here, does the stay pending further order of the court mean is stayed until it is somehow lifted?
Link to this comment:
All Comments (0)