Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Judge: Constitution "not relevant" - 2/3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
8,982
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 7, 2010

Sponsor: http://RidleyReport.com/PR - Remember that "Judge wigs out" story where a New Hampshire-bound freedom activist takes on a New Jersey court?
Well here's part two of his latest hearing in that traffic case, as he continues his measured defiance... and continues to audio tape the proceedings.
Link to part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwJN3zFHF5c
Mainstream coverage of Chrono's other adventures:
http://www.mycentraljersey.com/article/20100222/NEWS/100222067/-1/newsfront/S...

How you can buy yerself an ad on the Ridley Report:
http://RidleyReport.com/Ad

new jersey liberty ron paul uniform commercial code moors ridleyreport civil disobedience free state project court nh traffic ticket dave ridley report robert menard freemen liberty freeman sovereign sovereignty live free or die confrontation defiance libertarian all caps judge prosecutor new hampshire police cops staters conspiracy corporate fiction living soul ed brown elaine show me the law marc stevens stephens government nj ian freeman have a seat case

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (151)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • How about asking the Cop if he had proof you were making use of the license.

  • The Constitution issue raised as-so-far as being relevant to the questioning of the public servant isn't relevant to the officers credibility. I'd imagine, the correct way would be to ask to have everything squashed or dismissed with prejudice BECAUSE there was no due process. I mean, isn't this a common law court preceding? Seems they all are very uptight for such...

  • @TheProverbialHater now there are two of us

  • @bradq

    I thought I was the only person here with their thinking cap on. You proved me wrong.

  • A statute is not LAW it is a "LEGISLATIVE RULE GIVEN THE FORCE OF LAW" THE LAW IS THE CONSTITUTION!!!

  • read "invisible contracts" by George Mercier.

  • the reason the constitution is not relevant is because the constitution does not over ride contracts.

  • Research Common Law Class on Youtube. I tried to paste the link and it would not let me.

  • You're right, it is Admirality Law. He should have established that 1st, by letting the judge know that he does not ave a "contract" with the court. And the Gold Tasle on the flag also indicates that. Also, he should ahve stated that he is a Natural Human, representing himself, and not his "fictious personality." The court is a corporation, and is He, as his name in all caps would indicate on the court docet. watch this:

  • THIS IS ADMIRALTY LAW NOT COMMON LAW OR EQUITY WHEN THE JUDGE SAID THAT THE CONSTITUTION DOES,NT APPLY HE IS RIGHT BECAUSE YOU ARE UNDER THE LAW OF THE SEA ADMIRALTY LAW PEOPLE ..THIS IS TOTAL CORUPTION, AND BREAK DOWN OF OUR LEGAL SYSTEM.. YOU SEE EVEN IN THIS LEGAL MATTER (DUE PROCESS) STILL APPLYS ..THE JUDGE IS ACTUALLY REPRESENTING THE POLICE OFFICER ALONG WITH THE PROSECUTER ..TOTAL CONFLICT OF INTREST....

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more