Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition 1 to 26
a groundbreaking interview of an ex officer of the Soviet nuclear intelligence
exposing the truth of the 9/11 events
This Video series has been censored all through the web.
Why I believe nuclear demolition fits all the evidence we know about.
They didn't call it "ground zero" for nothing! Before 911, ground zero only meant the area below or above a nuclear detonation, after 911, they changed some of the dictionaries to say it was also the place where terrorists attacked the trade centers. It's all mind control.
Dimitri Khalezov has been an expert in nuclear demolition for many years and has an incredible amount of proof that the buildings were taken down by underground micro nuclear demolition charges! I've posted some links to other material such as the melted cars that could have only been done by EMP type effects caused by a nuclear bomb since there was no jet fuel burning at ground level AND some of these cars were missing engine blocks! They were totally melted! How do you melt an engine block when no fire was burning at ground level - many of these cars were 7 blocks away! They were never explained in any way. Also it was never explained why Tritium levels were 55 times more than normal at ground zero. And of course we have ALL the strange cancers from first responders and many of them have died. They were forced to wear "air quality" badges which Dimitri says were really just radiation detectors in disguise so they could monitor everybody's exposure and pull people out of the hot zones for a while when their badges reported higher radiation. Easy to lie to everybody and tell them the badge is to monitor air quality. That is pure garbage if you think about it. There is not going to be that much difference in "air quality around such a relatively small area anyway.
Dimitri even said that in the 70's he was told that the Americans had authorized the twin towers to be taken down at the end of their lifetimes with small nuclear demolition charges! I did some research and it was true! It was determined that only a nuclear demolition charge could safely bring down both Towers and Building 7 because of their construction. Here's some good information on nuclear demolition
wow this guy confirms all I was ever thinking how it happened. Is he still alive? Danny Jowenko was killed for his building 7 interview, it's on here aswell.
barthoedemaker 6 days ago
@aLocoCooKoo
He never said mega ton... It was a Kiloton device.
7:40
C4rn1f3XaNgeL 1 month ago
half a megaton would have voporised most of washington dc.
aLocoCooKoo 2 months ago
There is video of steel turning to dust, no other explanation makes sense other than this one by dimitri, and please, watch the entire interview before you post stuff...
stonebrownalien 3 months ago
@opiumkidx that would be a good yakov joke
fedorov28 3 months ago
@bluesman979 quoting the lung cancer statement and they trying somehow to connect that to nuclear fallout. no fallout, just lung cancer. people do breath air. I said lung cancer because the air was toxic, which is a proven fact beyond debate. Its childish to call one a name when backed into a proverbial corner. Its a sign of ignorance. im in no corner, nor am i ignorant of the facts. stick to bashing the "nuke" believers. As for Tesla, THE most under rated scientist of all time.
dominic150 3 months ago
in America the terriost are the goverment.
opiumkidx 3 months ago
@dominic150
"mind figuring out the resonant frequency of the towers?"
Maybe a "Tesla Oscillator" type mechanical resonator ...
h t t p : / / tinyurl . com / bauhhn
"In 1898,Tesla's New York lab was nearly shaken to pieces with this little device..." !
... Would be a quick and easy way to find if a building had a resonance/resonant harmonic series (and at what frequencies) but built bigger than Tesla's was for the testing ;-)
I think I would pay to watch that test :-D
bluesman979 4 months ago
@dominic150
"...mind figuring out the resonant frequency of the towers?"
To do so would require an immense calculation (including the details of all materials, thier density how they were fixed/interacted (rigid fixings give an object different resonances to de-coupled/damped ones for instance))
Given these variables I believe it *would* be possible to calculate the resonant frequency, if sufficient computing power and the inclination were available for the task
HTH
bluesman979 4 months ago
@dominic150
"meaning that i never used words like radioactive or nukes being used. i never said anything about russian cruise missiles or nukes.."
Where did I attribute these words to you ?
DK made those assertions as is apparent
"yet im the one who is childish. children jump to conclusions, adults do not. act like one and read other posts before jumping to conclusions."
Name calling is childish, do you deny saying ...
"unitelligent...complete ass" (sic) ?
HTH ;-)
bluesman979 4 months ago